GET Stock QuotesNews18 APP
News18 English
Powered by cricketnext logo
»
1-min read

Justice Karnan Seeks President's Intervention in the Contempt Case

A fresh representation has been made to the President on behalf of Calcutta High Court judge CS Karnan seeking suspension of the Supreme Court order sentencing him to six-month imprisonment for contempt of court, a lawyer representing him has said.

PTI

Updated:May 21, 2017, 10:01 PM IST
facebookTwittergoogleskypewhatsapp
Justice Karnan Seeks President's Intervention in the Contempt Case
A file photo of Calcutta High Court Judge CS Karnan. (CNN-News18 Photo)

New Delhi: A fresh representation has been made to the President on behalf of Calcutta High Court judge CS Karnan seeking suspension of the Supreme Court order sentencing him to six-month imprisonment for contempt of court, a lawyer representing him has said.

Advocate Mathews J Nedumpara said that he, along with other counsel representing the high court judge and his son C S Sugan, met Ashok Mehta, the Secretary to the President, and handed over an application for suspension of the sentence under Article 72 of the Constitution.

He said they have sought personal audience for Justice Karnan with the President.

The lawyers took the ground in the application that Justice Karnan will be unable to exercise any remedy if he is arrested. The controversial judge has not been arrested yet.

"Therefore, an application seeking the President's intervention under Article 72 has been made," Nedumpara said.

Article 72 states that the President shall have the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence.

In the application it has been contended that the Supreme Court had acted without jurisdiction, the lawyer said.

On May 9, a seven-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice JS Khehar, had sentenced Justice Karnan to six months jail for contempt of court and ordered the West Bengal police to take him into custody forthwith.

Nedumpara had earlier claimed that the defence team made an identical representation to the President through an e-mail. However, the President's Office had said, "It was not aware of any such representation."

The latest application has been filed after the apex court's registry refused to accept Justice Karnan's petition seeking recall of the May 9 judgment.

Also Watch

Read full article
Next Story
Next Story
facebookTwittergoogleskypewhatsapp

Live TV