GET Stock QuotesNews18 APP
News18 English

Assembly Election LIVE Results

  • LOST

    Shaktisinh Gohil

    INC (Mandvi)
  • WON

    Jignesh Mevani

    IND (Vadgam (SC)
  • WON

    Alpesh Thakor

    INC (Radhanpur)
  • WON

    Nitinbhai Patel

    BJP (Mahesana)
  • WON

    Hitu Kanodiya

    BJP (Idar (SC)
  • WON

    Pradipsinh Jadeja

    BJP (Vatva)
  • LOST

    Babubhai Mangukiya

    INC (Thakkarbapa Nagar)
  • WON

    Himmatsinh Patel

    INC (Bapunagar)
  • WON

    Bhupendrasinh Chudasama

    BJP (Dholka)
  • WON

    Somabhai Patel

    INC (Limbdi)
  • LOST

    Indranil Rajguru

    INC (Rajkot West)
  • WON

    Vijay Rupani

    BJP (Rajkot West)
  • WON

    Jayesh Radadiya

    BJP (Jetpur)
  • WON

    Lalit Vasoya

    INC (Dhoraji)
  • LOST

    Raghavjibhai Patel

    BJP (Jamnagar Rural)
  • WON

    Hakubha Jadeja

    BJP (Jamnagar North)
  • LOST

    Arjun Modhwadia

    INC (Porbandar)
  • WON

    Paresh Dhanani

    INC (Amreli)
  • WON

    Purshottam Solanki

    BJP (Bhavnagar Rural)
  • WON

    Jitu Vaghan

    BJP (Bhavnagar West)
  • WON

    Saurabh Patel

    BJP (Botad)
  • LOST

    Ramsinh Parmar

    BJP (Thasra)
  • WON

    CK Raulji

    BJP (Godhra)
  • WON

    Mohansinh Rathava

    INC (Chhota Udaipur (ST)
  • LOST

    Siddharth Patel

    INC (Dabhoi)
  • WON

    Manisha Vakil

    BJP (Vadodara City (SC)
  • WON

    Rajendra Trivedi

    BJP (Raopura)
  • WON

    Mahesh Vasava

    BTP (Dediapada (ST)
  • WON

    Chhotubhai Vasava

    BTP (Jhagadia (ST)
  • LOST

    Tusharbhai Chaudhari

    INC (Mahuva (ST)
  • LOST

    Thakur Singh Bharmouri

    INC (Bharmour (ST)
  • WON

    Asha Kumari

    INC (Dalhousie)
  • TRAILING

    GS Bali

    INC (Nagrota)
  • LOST

    Sudhir Sharma

    INC (Dharamshala)
  • LOST

    Indu Goswami

    BJP (Palampur)
  • WON

    Jai Ram Thakur

    BJP (Seraj)
  • WON

    Anil Sharma

    BJP (Mandi)
  • LOST

    Champa Thakur

    INC (Mandi)
  • LOST

    Prem Kumar Dhumal

    BJP (Sujanpur)
  • LOST

    Satpal Singh Satti

    BJP (Una)
  • WON

    Virbhadra Singh

    INC (Arki)
  • WON

    Suresh Bhardwaj

    BJP (Shimla)
  • WON

    Vikramaditya Singh

    INC (Shimla Rural)
  • WON

    Narinder Bragta

    BJP (Jubbal Kotkhai)
»
2-min read

Not Just Constitution and Laws, Religion and Scriptures Also Recognise Privacy, Says SC

Justice S A Bobde, the second senior-most judge on the bench, highlighted how religious and mythological scriptures recognized privacy as a crucial right since time immemorial.

Utkarsh Anand |

Updated:August 24, 2017, 7:30 PM IST
facebookTwittergoogleskypewhatsapp
Not Just Constitution and Laws, Religion and Scriptures Also Recognise Privacy, Says SC
(Image: Network18 Creatives)
New Delhi: It was not only the interpretation of the Indian Constitution and the international laws that prompted the nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court to elevate privacy as a fundamental right, inhering in every aspect of life and liberty.

Justice S A Bobde, the second senior-most judge on the bench, highlighted how religious and mythological scriptures recognized privacy as a crucial right since time immemorial. Striking a distinct chord, the judge referred to Ramayana, Arthashashtra, Hadith and Christianity to assert the value of this right.

“Even in the ancient and religious texts of India, a well-developed sense of privacy is evident. A woman ought not to be seen by a male stranger seems to be a well-established rule in the Ramayana,” said Justice Bobde, adding the Arthashastra prohibits entry into another’s house without the owner’s consent.

Aadhar_Lawyers4

Grihya Sutras, he said, prescribe the manner in which individual should build one’s house so as to protect the privacy of its inmates and preserve its sanctity during the performance of religious rites, or when studying the Vedas or taking meals.

Justice Bobde pointed out there is still a community, Ramanuj Sampradaya, in southern India, members of which continue to observe the practice of not eating and drinking in the presence of anyone else.

“Similarly in Islam, peeping into others’ houses is strictly prohibited,” said the judge. He drew a parallel between the United States Fourth Amendment that guarantees privacy in one’s papers and personal effects and the Hadith (discretions of Prophet Muhammad as described by his followers) which makes it reprehensible to read correspondence between others.

In a separately authored judgment, Justice Bobde said: “In Christianity, we find the aspiration to live without interfering in the affairs of others in the text of the Bible. Confession of one’s sins is a private act.”

The judge emphasized that religious and social customs affirming privacy also find acknowledgment in our laws. “For example, in the Civil Procedure Code’s exemption of a pardanashin lady’s appearance in Court,” he underlined.

According to Justice Bobde, privacy os a basic pre-requisite for exercising the liberty and the freedom to perform a desired activity and that the “inability to create a condition of selective seclusion” will deny an individual the freedom to exercise that particular liberty or freedom necessary to do that activity.

He underscored that privacy is about ‘the right to be let alone’ and it pre-supposes a condition to have the power to seclude oneself and keep others from intruding it in any way. “These intrusions may be physical or visual, and may take any of several forms including peeping over one’s shoulder to eavesdropping directly or through instruments, devices or technological aids,” added the judge.

The right and the need to privacy, Justice Bobde said, is not lost even in a public space. “In fact, a conglomeration of individuals in a space to which the rights of admission are reserved – as in a hotel or a cinema hall –must be regarded as private. Nor is the right to privacy lost when a person moves about in public,” he said.
Read full article
Next Story
facebookTwittergoogleskypewhatsapp

Live TV

File is:/article-scroll-new.php