» » India

The 'expatriate' hire as head of school: An intrinsic 'Indian' need?

Jayshree Misra Tripathi

Updated: August 13, 2013, 2:28 PM IST
facebook Twitter skype whatsapp
As an Indian, I will always revere 'Athithi Devo Bhava': expatriates or guests are 'god-like' and we must and will maintain our traditional 'welcome' of them.



However, when I recently enquired from a Human Resources Team in India what they meant by "expatriate" in their advertisement for a Principal, I was informed: "one who is not an Indian citizen". In my opinion, this implies prejudice and insensibility. If an Indian citizen lives overseas, due to the spouse's job, then this ought to qualify him or her for the NRI or 'expat category'. No further information or explanation was given. Therefore, I had no other option but to stop soliciting information.



My thoughts and words are directed at the management of schools, who willingly pay an expatriate teacher almost 4 to 5 times that of a local hire's salary. True, some incentives must be given to help expatriates relocate. However, local hires work as hard, are also expected to maintain the 'equilibrium' of the institute, even explain issues to parents, who are often unable to fathom 'accents'. This includes the explanation of entire programmes of study.



There are few corporate-style benefits in the education sector. Voluntary work is usually undertaken willingly and conducted thoroughly. Surely the staff needs to be appreciated for all their extra efforts?



True, there are the 'vacations' that others underscore as relaxation and beneficial, but let us keep that aside. My contention is: Why may an Indian not head a secondary 'world class' institute? There are a few exceptions in the country, but too few in this given context.



When we Indian nationals apply overseas, we are not always taken in the same numero uno position. As a vice principal, perhaps, so we tend to lose out, both at home and overseas.



If you do internet searches and check websites that mention leadership roles in education, recently selected for positions across the globe, you will rarely find a name from our sub-continent.



I have often asked my colleagues overseas why this occurs, only to encounter a shrug of the shoulders or a comment on accents or communication issues. Not that all western accents are easy to follow, including those from down under, still managements continue to seek newly-retired expatriates, or those already in the country with another school ('poaching politely!') or those who are in other roles or careers, even those with very little experience in teaching... the examples are endless. Why do they not promote faculty under their very noses? Collegiality is a must, but under such circumstances, it often causes rifts.



Do I suffer from an inferiority complex? No, but I do feel disheartened at all the advertisements for expatriate principals, directors, heads of international schools that are now mushrooming across our nation. Seven years ago, there were a mere handful of such schools, offering international programmes of study. Now there are over one hundred. Parents are paying 'top-dollar' or may I re-phrase that to, 'top-rupee' for their children to be educated in excellent academic programmes, accepted globally, that also nurture the all-round development of the student, easing the angst of adolescence and alienation into mature adulthood.



The teachers are required to be trained in these programmes, that require many hours of reading and learning about standard assessment procedures and a full-understanding of the programmes too. It is extremely hard work and a continuous process for the 2 years of study.



I fully support these programmes of study. I also fully support hiring expatriate staff. However, I cannot fathom why institutions are hiring directors and principals from overseas, when we have so much talent at home? True, such hires do add to the cultural diversity and sensitivity of our institutions. A few expatriate teachers are definitely required, to provide a balanced environment for the students. This inclusion of staff, in turn, equips students for their future studies and careers, wherever they may choose to study, either at home or overseas. We need to show that selection procedures remain transparent and are based on merit and experience. We need to show that India, the land of cultural diversity, cares for its own and will also care for those who come to live in our land. We need to show professional courtesy. We must not neglect our own and cause unhappiness or inadvertently cause stagnation or lateral growth in a person's career.



Teachers are our hope for the future of our children.



As Rabindranath Tagore said: "Every child comes with the message that God is not yet discouraged of man."



And it is our teachers, at school and in college, who will help instill knowledge, tradition and values in our children. They are the ones who will also inculcate in their pupils a love of learning, that should last a life-time.



We do need to support our teachers and help them continue in their chosen profession, with dignity. This includes promotions and benefits and not having to worry endlessly about retirement with no pension benefits.
First Published: August 13, 2013, 2:28 PM IST

Live TV

Countdown To Elections Results
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results
Loading