News18»Auto
1-MIN READ

Delhi Man Files Plea Against Challan for Not Wearing Mask While Driving Alone, HC Seeks Response

This is the first time since the outbreak of the pandemic that over 4,000 cases have been recorded in Delhi in a day.

This is the first time since the outbreak of the pandemic that over 4,000 cases have been recorded in Delhi in a day.

The petitioner, has claimed in his plea that on September 9 while driving to work he was stopped by Delhi Police officials and was challaned for not wearing a mask even though he was alone in the car.

The Delhi High Court Thursday sought response of the Centre and AAP government on a lawyer's plea challenging the ₹ 500 challan issued to him for not wearing a mask while he was driving alone.

Justice Navin Chawla issued notice to the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Delhi government, Delhi Disaster Management Authority (DDMA) and the police seeking their stand on the petition which seeks quashing of the challan, refund of the ₹ 500 paid as fine and compensation of ₹ 10 lakh for mental harassment suffered by the petitioner.

The petitioner, Saurabh Sharma, has claimed in his plea that on September 9 while driving to work he was stopped by Delhi Police officials and was challaned for not wearing a mask even though he was alone in the car.

Mr Sharma, represented by advocate KC Mittal, has contended that there is a Health Ministry notification clarifying that wearing a mask was not compulsory while driving alone in a car.

Advocate Farman Ali Magray, appearing for the ministry, said he needs to confirm whether such a notification has been issued.

Mr Sharma, in his plea, has said that the officials challaning him failed to provide any executive order which makes it mandatory to wear masks while travelling alone in a private vehicle.

They also did not heed his request to write on the challan that he was driving alone and he paid the "illegal" fine under protest, the petition has said.

It has contended that in the absence of any law or notification making it mandatory to wear a mask while driving alone in a private vehicle, the levy of fine on him was "ex-facie arbitrary and illegal".

Mr Mittal, during the hearing, argued that the guidelines issued by DDMA only state that the mask has to be worn in a public place or place of work, and a private vehicle is neither.

The DDMA contended that its guidelines issued in April and June this year make it mandatory to wear a mask in a public place and added that the Supreme Court has held that a private vehicle is a public place.


Next Story
Loading...