Take the pledge to vote

For a better tommorow#AajSawaroApnaKal
  • I agree to receive emails from News18

  • I promise to vote in this year's elections no matter what the odds are.
  • Please check above checkbox.


Thank you for
taking the pledge

Vote responsibly as each vote counts
and makes a diffrence


Issued in public interest by HDFC Life. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (Formerly HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited) (“HDFC Life”). CIN: L65110MH2000PLC128245, IRDAI Reg. No. 101 . The name/letters "HDFC" in the name/logo of the company belongs to Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited ("HDFC Limited") and is used by HDFC Life under an agreement entered into with HDFC Limited. ARN EU/04/19/13618
News18 » Auto
1-min read

Public More Likely to Blame Drivers in Accidents Involving Automated Cars: Study

Research published in Nature Human Behaviour journal says that people blame the driver, whether human or machine, much more than flaws in the self-driving technology.


Updated:October 29, 2019, 2:33 PM IST
facebookTwitter Pocket whatsapp
Public More Likely to Blame Drivers in Accidents Involving Automated Cars: Study
Image for Representation. (Image: AFP Relaxnews)

The public was more likely to blame accidents involving semi-autonomous cars on the driver rather than the machine, according to a new study. For the study published in the journal Nature Human Behaviour, the researchers from the University of Exeter examined how the general public attribute blame in accidents involving self-driving cars. "It seems like if we leave it to the general public, they may unintentionally go soft on AV manufacturers to improve their safety standards," said study researcher Edmond Awad. The study found that in crashes involving a car that has dual human and AI controls, the public presumes that the machine is less accountable.

For the study, the research team asked members of the public to consider hypothetical cases in which a pedestrian was killed by a car operated under shared control between humans and machines, and to indicate how blame should be allocated. It found that when one driver makes an error, they were blamed more, regardless of whether that driver is a machine or a human. Significantly, however, when both drivers make errors in cases of human-machine shared-control vehicles, the blame attributed to the machine is reduced.

There is a greater presumption that the human driver should be held more accountable. The research team believe the results could have significant ramifications for how juries could apportion blame in future death-crash cases. While the pursuit of creating fully 'driverless' cars has been the goal for many manufacturers in recent years, they still remain some way off from coming to fruition, the study said.

Get the best of News18 delivered to your inbox - subscribe to News18 Daybreak. Follow News18.com on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, Telegram, TikTok and on YouTube, and stay in the know with what's happening in the world around you – in real time.

| Edited by: Chhavianshika Singh
Read full article
Next Story
Next Story

facebookTwitter Pocket whatsapp

Live TV

Countdown To Elections Results
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results