Home » News » Buzz » Form with No Option for Mother as Guardian Goes Viral Causing Outrage among Women
3-MIN READ

Form with No Option for Mother as Guardian Goes Viral Causing Outrage among Women

The form that had no 'mother' check-box.
(Credit: @tanvivij92)

The form that had no 'mother' check-box. (Credit: @tanvivij92)

It can be seen that Tanvi wrote Mother and ticked a box that she created next to it in the ‘Relationship type’ column.

Patriarchy operates in our society in both subtle and crude forms. Putting the father’s surname after the child’s name or considering the father as the guardian of a student are some of the subtle ways in which the importance of the father is asserted, almost obiletaring the acknowledgement of mother’s contribution in the life and upbringing of the child.

There are several reminders around us that patriarchy is thriving in the country but when institutions also contribute to the regressive practice, it becomes concerning.

A Twitter user Tanvi Vij shared the picture of a form she was seemingly filling where among other things, she was asked to write the name of her guardian. In the ‘Relationship type’, there were only two options: ‘Father’ or ‘Husband.’

It can be seen that Tanvi wrote Mother and ticked a box that she created next to it in the ‘Relationship type’ column.

Sharing the picture on Twitter, she wrote, “Mummy ka column kyu nahi hai bhai” (Why is there no column for mummy).

Her justified question invited several supportive comments from the users who have faced the same or are against the practice of considering only the men a guardian in the life of a woman.

Ruby Rani, a commenter asked, “How can a husband be a guardian??"

Another person named Abhishek Gupta said that not just father’s name in the guardian column, many forms usually ask the applicant to write father’s income as if only the father earns.

Another Twitter user supported Tanvi and said, “I personally know many women raising their kids all on their own in India. This needs to change.”

One more person raised the question why the relationship type column puts ‘husband’ as an option under guardian and not ‘spouse.’

Ambika Pandit, another Twitter user, said that the option for mother’s name just as it is there for father’s name. She pointed out that the children of single mothers are asking and struggling with the question that has been asked by Tanvi.

However, there were many who took offense to Tanvi’s question and made some uninformed comments.

In response to Tanvi’s question about the missing column for mother’s name, one person replied, “Because father pays for your education.”

But people were quick to point out the flaw in that statement. A person said in the reply, “That’s not always the case! Shame on this ideology!”

Read all the Latest News, Breaking News and Coronavirus News here