Take the pledge to vote

For a better tommorow#AajSawaroApnaKal
  • I agree to receive emails from News18

  • I promise to vote in this year's elections no matter what the odds are.
  • Please check above checkbox.

    SUBMIT

Thank you for
taking the pledge

Vote responsibly as each vote counts
and makes a diffrence

Disclaimer:

Issued in public interest by HDFC Life. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (Formerly HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited) (“HDFC Life”). CIN: L65110MH2000PLC128245, IRDAI Reg. No. 101 . The name/letters "HDFC" in the name/logo of the company belongs to Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited ("HDFC Limited") and is used by HDFC Life under an agreement entered into with HDFC Limited. ARN EU/04/19/13618
LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
News18 English

EXIT Poll Results

Detailed Exit Poll Results
News18 » India
1-min read

Ajmer Blast Case: Quantum of Punishment Likely on March 18

The defence counsel also said the court should consider one section for conspiracy instead of two sections for deciding the quantum of sentence.

Press Trust Of India

Updated:March 16, 2017, 5:59 PM IST
facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp
Ajmer Blast Case: Quantum of Punishment Likely on March 18
(Representative image)

Jaipur: A special court is likely to pronounce the quantum of sentence in the 2007 Ajmer dargah bomb blast case on March 18.

The special CBI court on Thursday heard the arguments on the sentencing and posted the matter for Saturday.

During the hearing, the defence counsel argued that the case should not be linked with religion after the prosecution submitted that it was the "first case where it is proved that the members of the community to which the convicts belong are involved in terror activities".

The defence counsel also said the court should consider one section for conspiracy instead of two sections for deciding the quantum of sentence.

The court had on March 8 convicted Bhavesh Patel, Devendra Gupta and Sunil Joshi while acquitting others including Swami Aseemanand. Joshi has already died.

The conviction was made under charges of criminal conspiracy, malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings and related offences and relevant sections of the Explosives Substances Act.

The defence counsel, Jagdish Rana, argued that both the sections of 120-B of IPC and 18 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) deal with conspiracy, so only the latter should only be considered to fix the quantum of punishment.

Before this, Public Prosecutor Ashwini Kumar said the court should consider that the bomb blast killed three persons and left 15 injured.

He said the bomb was planted at the place of Sufi saint. and cited that the Supreme Court has also said that Hinduism is not a religion but a way of life. Indian culture follows the theory of live and let live, he added.

The defence counsel objected, saying this should not be linked with religion.

Theblaston October 11, 2007 in the dargah of Khawaja Moinuddin Chisti at the time of Roza Iftaar, had left three pilgrims dead and 15 injured.

The case was handed over to ATS Rajasthan and later transferred to NIA which re-registered the case with the agency's police station in New Delhi on April 6, 2011.

There were as many as 149 witnesses in the case and 451 documents were examined and the NIA filed three supplementary charge sheet in the case.

Get the best of News18 delivered to your inbox - subscribe to News18 Daybreak. Follow News18.com on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, Telegram, TikTok and on YouTube, and stay in the know with what's happening in the world around you – in real time.

| Edited by: Nakshab Khan
Read full article
Next Story
Next Story

Also Watch

facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp

Live TV

Countdown To Elections Results
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results