Ayodhya Case Back in Cold Storage, SC Says Swamy Not Party to Dispute
In a setback to BJP leader Subramanian Swamy, the Supreme Court on Friday refused urgent hearing in the Ayodhya land dispute case, questioning his locus standi and stated that Swamy had led the court “to believe that he was a party to the dispute.”
New Delhi: In a setback to BJP leader Subramanian Swamy, the Supreme Court on Friday refused urgent hearing in the Ayodhya land dispute case, questioning his locus standi and stated that Swamy had led the court “to believe that he was a party to the dispute.”
"What is your locus standi in the case? We don't have time to hear you now,” the Supreme Court bench told Swamy.
On Thursday, the son of one of the main litigants in the Ram Janam Bhumi-Babri Masjid land dispute case had objected to Swamy’s plea. Mohammad Hashim Ansari's son had written to the Secretary General of the apex court saying the Rajya Sabha MP mentioned the matter before the Chief Justice of India without even informing the Advocate On Record, including the lawyer who has been appearing for his father.
Ansari, one of the oldest litigants in the Ayodhya dispute, had died in July last year due to heart-related ailments at the age of 95. He was first to file the suit in the court of civil judge of Faizabad on the matter.
On March 21, the top court had suggested an out-of-court settlement of the lingering dispute at Ayodhya, observing that issues of "religion and sentiments" can be best resolved through talks.
Chief Justice JS Khehar had also offered to mediate even as the bench headed by him suggested that the parties to the dispute adopt a "give a bit and take a bit" approach for a meaningful and sincere negotiations to resolve the issue.
The observations were made after Swamy mentioned the matter seeking urgent hearing, saying that it has been over six years after the High Court decided the civil appeal and that it needed to be heard at the earliest.
The BJP Parliamentarian had told the court that he had approached the Muslim community members who favoured judicial decision in the contentious matter.
The Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court, in 2010, had ruled for a three-way division of the disputed 2.77 acres area at the site in Uttar Pradesh.
The three-judge bench, by a majority of 2:1, had said the land be partitioned equally among three parties, Sunni Waqf Board, Nirmohi Akhara and the 'Ram Lalla'.
Recommended For You
- KGF: Rajamouli Proud of Yash's Success, Says 'Bus Driver's Son Became top Star of Kannada Cinema'
- Rajinikanth on Petta: It's a Throwback to My 90s' Films, Karthik Made It Like True Rajini Fan
- Priyanka Chopra's Mother Strongly Reacts to The Cut Article: Don't Want to Give Publicity to Fools
- India vs Australia: Pant Surpasses Saha & Equals World Record For Most Dismissals in a Test
- River Plate Edge Out Boca Juniors After Extra Time to Win Copa Libertadores in Madrid