Take the pledge to vote

For a better tommorow#AajSawaroApnaKal
  • I agree to receive emails from News18

  • I promise to vote in this year's elections no matter what the odds are.
  • Please check above checkbox.

    SUBMIT

Thank you for
taking the pledge

Vote responsibly as each vote counts
and makes a diffrence

Disclaimer:

Issued in public interest by HDFC Life. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (Formerly HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited) (“HDFC Life”). CIN: L65110MH2000PLC128245, IRDAI Reg. No. 101 . The name/letters "HDFC" in the name/logo of the company belongs to Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited ("HDFC Limited") and is used by HDFC Life under an agreement entered into with HDFC Limited. ARN EU/04/19/13618
LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
»
1-min read

Cash-on-Delivery Deals By E-commerce Firms May Be Illegal, Reveals RTI Query

The Reserve Bank of India said it had not issued any specific instructions regarding the payment mechanism and it was hence a grey area.

News18.com

Updated:July 24, 2018, 10:16 PM IST
facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp
Cash-on-Delivery Deals By E-commerce Firms May Be Illegal, Reveals RTI Query
Image for representation (Reuters)
Loading...

New Delhi: The introduction of the cash-on-delivery (CoD) option by Flipkart in 2010 gave a shot in the arm to India’s e-commerce boom. Users suspicious of or outside the ambit of netbanking still depend on the conventional method for their purchases.

However, a recent RTI query has revealed that the payment mechanism is a “grey area” so far the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is concerned.

Dharmendra Kumar of India FDI Watch filed an RTI application, asking the RBI to confirm whether “cash-on-delivery payment collection and disbursement to ecommerce merchants by ecommerce marketplaces such as Flipkart and Amazon (are) covered under the definition of payment system and system provider of the Payments and Settlements Systems Act, 2007, No. 51 of 2007 by acting as intermediaries and system providers. If yes, are these payment systems authorised as per Section 8 of the said Act?”

Responding to the query, the apex bank said “aggregators/payment intermediaries like Amazon and Flipkart are not authorised under Section 8 of the PSS (Payments and Settlements Systems) Act, 2007”. It added that “RBI has not issued any specific instruction in this regard”, the Economic Times reported.

Kumar said the RBI’s response showed that there was no clear law governing the transactions and the apex bank should have a system to ensure the grey area is not exploited by the firms.

In the CoD method, e-commerce players collect cash from customers on behalf of third-party vendors when the goods are delivered instead of demanding online payment when the order is placed.

Read full article
Loading...
Next Story
Next Story

Also Watch

facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp

Live TV

Loading...
Countdown To Elections Results
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results