Entertaining Chidambaram's Plea Against Remand Orders Will Set Bad Precedent: CBI Tells SC
The affidavit of CBI was filed before a bench of Justices R Banumathi and A S Bopanna, which directed that P Chidambaram would remain in the CBI custody till September 5 and listed his plea for hearing on Thursday.
File photo of P Chidambaram. (Photo: PTI)
New Delhi: The CBI told the Supreme Court on Tuesday that entertaining former finance minister P Chidambaram's plea challenging the remand orders of a trial court in the INX media corruption case would "set a very bad precedent".
The probe agency sought dismissal of Chidambaram's plea and said all similarly placed accused would come directly to the top court, challenging the remand orders of the trial court "as liberty of other citizen would not be less important than of petitioner (P Chidambaram)".
The affidavit of CBI was filed before a bench of Justices R Banumathi and A S Bopanna, which directed that Chidambaram would remain in the CBI custody till September 5 and listed his plea for hearing on Thursday.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, filed the affidavit on the plea of Chidambaram in which he has challenged the non-bailable warrant (NBW) issued against him and the subsequent remand orders passed by the trial court.
The bench ordered that "status quo" be maintained on Chidambaram's custody despite the CBI insisting that it does not require his further custodial interrogation in the case. In an affidavit filed by CBI SP Rajpal Meena, the probe agency said: "I state and submit that entertaining of a petition under Article 136 of the Constitution directly against an order of remand passed by the competent court in exercise of discretionary jurisdiction under section 167 of the CrPC would set a very bad precedent."
It said there is a remedy available against the orders before the higher forum and it is settled legal position that this court would not invoke its constitutional discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136, directly against an order of the Special Judge remanding an accused to few days of police custody.
"If this court were to entertain the SLP directly against the order of the special judge remanding the accused to police custody, all the litigants whose prayer for listing of SLP against anticipatory bail are refused and are thereafter arrested will be entitled to file similar petitions challenging the orders of special judge granting police remand directly before this court as the personal liberty of other citizens (which is interfered with in accordance with law) would not be less important than petitioner," the CBI said.
It said that normally such orders are not interfered with even by the high courts, more particularly when the Special Court has, after an elaborate and lengthy hearing, passed a detailed speaking order in exercise of its judicial discretion.
Referring to a Constitution bench verdict of apex court in 1986, the CBI said that normally the high court is the final arbiter in bail/anticipatory bail matters. "Generally all SLPs challenging the bail/anticipatory bail are, therefore, not allowed to be listed immediately on mentioning before the Chief Justice of India unless extraordinary and special reasons are shown," it said.
The CBI further said that Chidambaram has not pointed out any extraordinary circumstances which would have justified any deviation from the consistent practice being followed.
"There are no extraordinary or grave circumstances which justifies the petitioner to by-pass the statutory remedies which are resorted to by all citizens challenging the order of remand and there may be no justification for allowing the petitioner to do so by entertaining the present SLP," it said and sought dismissal of appeal filed by Chidambaram.
The apex court is also scheduled to pronounce its order on September 5 on Chidambaram's separate plea in which he has challenged the August 20 verdict of the Delhi High Court denying him anticipatory bail in the INX Media money laundering case lodged by the Enforcement Directorate.
The top court had on Monday given partial relief to Chidambaram saying he would not be sent to Tihar Jail after the former finance minister offered to be under house arrest instead of being sent to prison. The CBI had lodged an FIR on May 15, 2017, alleging irregularities in Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) clearance granted to INX Media group for receiving overseas funds of Rs 305 crore in 2007 during Chidambaram's tenure as union finance minister.
Thereafter the ED had lodged a separate money laundering case in 2017. Chidambaram was the finance minister and home minister during the UPA-I and UPA-II government from 2004 to 2014.
Get the best of News18 delivered to your inbox - subscribe to News18 Daybreak. Follow News18.com on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok and on YouTube, and stay in the know with what's happening in the world around you – in real time.
Recommended For You
- Ragnarok Director Taika Waititi Finally Reveals Who's the Real Star of Thor Love and Thunder
- Russian Goalkeeper Saveli Kononov Gets AK-47 for his Man of the Match Performance
- Denmark Buys 4 Elephants from Circus to Protect Their Rights and Welfare
- Newton Trends on Twitter After Railway Minister Piyush Goyal Says 'Einstein Discovered Gravity'
- Mi TV Netflix Support to Finally Roll Out on September 17, Suggests Teaser