LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
News18 English
»
2-min read

Explain Logic Behind Appointing Senior Lawyers for Petty Matters, Mumbai High Court Asks BMC

A bench of Justices BR Gavai and MS Karnik said that considering that the corporation pays these lawyers using funds from the "public exchequer", it owes an explanation to the court and to the public for leaving the "important cases to not-so-capable lawyers".

PTI

Updated:September 2, 2017, 5:26 PM IST
facebookTwittergoogleskypewhatsapp
Explain Logic Behind Appointing Senior Lawyers for Petty Matters, Mumbai High Court Asks BMC
A policeman stands guard outside the Bombay High Court/File photo.
Loading...
Mumbai: Irked by the "lackadaisical response" of the BMC lawyers in "several important" cases, the Bombay High Court has directed the civic body to explain the logic it employs for leaving these cases to "not-so-capable" advocates while engaging services of "senior counsel for petty matters".

The court directed Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) Commissioner Ajoy Mehta to file an affidavit on the issue by September 7 this year.

A bench of Justices BR Gavai and MS Karnik said that considering that the corporation pays these lawyers using funds from the "public exchequer", it owes an explanation to the court and to the public for leaving the "important cases to not-so-capable lawyers".

"There is no doubt that it is the sweet choice of a litigant to engage whichever lawyer it wants to. However, the BMC runs on the money that it receives from the public exchequer. It ultimately spends the tax payers' money," the bench said.

"Therefore, we direct the BMC to personally file an affidavit explaining the logic behind the corporation's policy to engage senior counsel for petty matters, and leaving the important matters to those lawyers who are on its payroll," it said.

The bench also directed the BMC Commissioner to explain, in the affidavit, why "there is always an inordinate delay on part of the corporation when it comes to submitting its replies and affidavits in cases where it is a party."

It warned that if it finds the explanations in the affidavit to be "unsatisfactory", it will be "constrained to summon the BMC Commissioner to court".

The directions came while the court was hearing a petition filed by a real estate developer challenging an adverse order of the National Green Tribunal.

Not only had the Corporation delayed filing its reply in the case, but its lawyer also failed to satisfy the court's queries on the Union government's policies and environmental rules relevant to the case.

"We are taking judicial notice of some old newspaper reports that say that the BMC spends hundreds of crores on legal fees paid to senior lawyers. We have also noticed that even in petty matters concerning demolition of unauthorised structures, the services of senior lawyers are engaged," the bench said.

"However, in cases like the present that involve complicated issues, interpretation of laws and so, we find that BMC is being defended by a lawyer who is an employee of the corporation. We fail to appreciate the rationale behind leaving important matters that have bearings on the fate of many to the mercy of a lawyer who is not equipped to meet the challenges raised by the other side," the bench added.

Catch the Biggest Newsmakers and the Biggest Newsbreaks on CNN-News18, your favourite English TV news channel. Keep watching CNN-News18 at just 50 Paise per Month. Contact your cable /DTH operator Now!
*Rental / capacity fee of Rs.130/- as charged by cable / DTH operator may apply. **GST extra.

Read full article
Loading...
Next Story
Next Story

Also Watch

facebookTwittergoogleskypewhatsapp

Live TV

Loading...
Countdown To Elections Results
  • 01 d
  • 12 h
  • 38 m
  • 09 s
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results