Take the pledge to vote

For a better tommorow#AajSawaroApnaKal
  • I agree to receive emails from News18

  • I promise to vote in this year's elections no matter what the odds are.
  • Please check above checkbox.

    SUBMIT

Thank you for
taking the pledge

But the job is not done yet!
Vote for the deserving candidate this year.

Check your mail to know more

Disclaimer:

Issued in public interest by HDFC Life. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (Formerly HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited) (“HDFC Life”). CIN: L65110MH2000PLC128245, IRDAI Reg. No. 101 . The name/letters "HDFC" in the name/logo of the company belongs to Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited ("HDFC Limited") and is used by HDFC Life under an agreement entered into with HDFC Limited. ARN EU/04/19/13618
SPONSORED BY
LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
News18 English
»
3-min read

'Fair and Handsome' Ad Does not Disparage 'Fair & Lovely', Rules HC

The court passed the order on an application by HUL seeking to restrain Emami from telecasting one of its commercials for the product 'Fair and Handsome', which allegedly disparaged the goodwill and reputation of HUL's product 'Fair & Lovely'.

PTI

Updated:April 4, 2019, 6:33 PM IST
facebookTwittergoogleskypewhatsapp
'Fair and Handsome' Ad Does not Disparage 'Fair & Lovely', Rules HC
File photo of Delhi High Court (Picture courtesy: Getty Images)
Loading...
New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has held that the television advertisement of Emami's fairness cream for men does not disparage Hindustan Unilever's 'Fair & Lovely' cream.

Justice Jayant Nath said prima facie it cannot be concluded that Emami's TV commercial seeks to slander the goods of Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL).

"I conclude that there is no merit in the contention of the senior counsel for the plaintiff (HUL). In my opinion, over all the commercial advertisement does not leave an impression that in any manner disparages the product of the plaintiff. It cannot prima facie be concluded that the said TV commercial seeks to slander the goods of the plaintiff," the judge said.

The court passed the order on an application by HUL seeking to restrain Emami from telecasting one of its commercials for the product 'Fair and Handsome', which allegedly disparaged the goodwill and reputation of HUL's product 'Fair & Lovely'.

The interim application was filed in a pending suit of HUL of trademark infringement, disparagement and unfair trade practices allegedly by Emami.

The court listed the main suit for hearing on July 11.

It also said the cream shown in the TV commercial does not resemble HUL's product.

"In these facts and circumstances, the plaintiff now cannot complain about the TV commercial. The contentions of the plaintiff prima facie have no merits," the court said.

Regarding HUL's arguments on disparagement, the court said prima facie there were no merits.

"The TV commercial no doubt seems to make fun of a male using a ladies cream. Can it be said that this advertisement on account of the said dialogue stated is false or misleading or unfair or deceptive? Does it amount to generic disparagement The answer is in the negative.

"In my view, the plaintiff is being over sensitive on the story line of the TV commercial. The defendant had enough room to play around for making the advertisement. In view of the literature that has been posted on its own website by the plaintiff, it also cannot be said that prima facie the statements made in the advertisement regarding using of women's cream by men is false," the court said.

HUL had submitted that the ingredient 'niacinamide', used in its product, works in a similar manner on various skins, including men and women, with variable degree of efficiency.

It is common for male consumer to use fairness products available in the market without insisting for the products designed specifically for men and a large number of male consumers are using fairness products designed for men as well as for women skin, it claimed.

To specifically target the male population, in 2006, HUL launched its product 'Fair & Lovely Men', which was later renamed as 'Men's Fair & Lovely'.

HUL claimed that Emami, in its advertisement, makes a false claim that 'Fair & Lovely' was "rubbish and inefficacious" and its use was restricted only to women.

It also objected to the colour combination of the tube shown in the advertisement, that is pink and white, as HUL's product is also of the similar colour.

"This is an attempt to demean, diminish and injure the business of the plaintiff (HUL) while at the same time, seek to expand the business of the defendant (Emami)," it said.

Defending its advertisement, Emami said the intention behind the advertisement was to inform male consumers that the fairness cream used by female consumers was not effective on their skin, as the texture of male skin was completely different.

It said there was not a whisper regarding HUL's product and also comparison or denigration as alleged.

The court noted that Emami has now changed the colour of the tube shown in the advertisement to white, without a dual face logo, which was materially different from HUL's product.
Read full article
Loading...
Next Story
Next Story

Also Watch

facebookTwittergoogleskypewhatsapp
 
T&C Apply. ARN EU/04/19/13626
 

Live TV

Loading...
Countdown To Elections Results
  • 01 d
  • 12 h
  • 38 m
  • 09 s
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results