Take the pledge to vote

For a better tommorow#AajSawaroApnaKal
  • I agree to receive emails from News18

  • I promise to vote in this year's elections no matter what the odds are.
  • Please check above checkbox.

    SUBMIT

Thank you for
taking the pledge

Vote responsibly as each vote counts
and makes a diffrence

Disclaimer:

Issued in public interest by HDFC Life. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (Formerly HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited) (“HDFC Life”). CIN: L65110MH2000PLC128245, IRDAI Reg. No. 101 . The name/letters "HDFC" in the name/logo of the company belongs to Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited ("HDFC Limited") and is used by HDFC Life under an agreement entered into with HDFC Limited. ARN EU/04/19/13618
LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
News18 English
  • Municipal Corporations 9/10
  • TRS 8
  • INC 0
  • BJP 1
  • AIMIM 0
  • OTH 0
  • MUNICIPALITIES 114/120
  • TRS 96
  • INC 9
  • BJP 3
  • AIMIM 2
  • OTH 4
Refresh Data
Powered by cricketnext logo
News18 » India
1-min read

Green Activists Unhappy with SC Order on Coastal Road Project in Mumbai

Supreme Court, in its ruling on Tuesday, said that authorities can reclaim the land meant for construction of the eight-lane 29.2 km-long road project, but cannot develop it.

PTI

Updated:December 18, 2019, 1:25 PM IST
facebookTwitter Pocket whatsapp
Green Activists Unhappy with SC Order on Coastal Road Project in Mumbai
Supreme Court. (Image: Network18 Creatives)

Mumbai: Environment activists from Mumbai are unhappy with the Supreme Court's ruling that stayed the Bombay High Court order quashing the Coastal Road Zone clearances granted to the city civic body's Rs 14,000 crore coastal road project.

The top court, in its ruling on Tuesday, said that authorities can reclaim the land meant for construction of the eight-lane 29.2 km-long road project, but cannot develop it.

The ambitious project of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai proposes to connect the Marine Drive area in south Mumbai to suburban Borivali in north Mumbai.

Vanashakti NGO director Stalin D, who is one of the petitioners in the case, said the apex court order is "unjust, environmentally insensitive and devoid of scientific logic".

He said the high court's order was stayed without addressing issues raised by the petitioners, which is "gross miscarriage of justice".

"It is shocking and sad that the guideline (of a Rio convention), 'that precautionary principle will apply in matters of environment', was dumped by none less than the highest office of the judiciary," he said.

Another environment activist Zoru Bhathena said the Supreme Court has given a go ahead to the coastal road project without going into the merits of the case.

"Our opposition is to reclamation of the sea in the garb of a road. It is very sad that the apex court has said to go ahead with the reclamation, without going into the merits of the case," he said.

"Such damage to the environment can't be undone later on," said Bhathena, who is a petitioner in the case of tree feeling in Aarey Colony here to make way for a Metro car shed.

A Supreme Court bench of Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justices BR Gavai and Surya Kant on Tuesday said, "We are of the considered opinion that the order of the Bombay High Court dated July 16 should be stayed till further orders."

It said the respondents, including the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, can reclaim and secure the land meant for the road project but cannot develop it till further orders of the court.

The work on the project was completely stopped after the high court's stay order in July 2019.

Get the best of News18 delivered to your inbox - subscribe to News18 Daybreak. Follow News18.com on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, Telegram, TikTok and on YouTube, and stay in the know with what's happening in the world around you – in real time.

Read full article
Next Story
Next Story

facebookTwitter Pocket whatsapp

Live TV

Countdown To Elections Results
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results