Take the pledge to vote

For a better tommorow#AajSawaroApnaKal
  • I agree to receive emails from News18

  • I promise to vote in this year's elections no matter what the odds are.
  • Please check above checkbox.

    SUBMIT

Thank you for
taking the pledge

Vote responsibly as each vote counts
and makes a diffrence

Disclaimer:

Issued in public interest by HDFC Life. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (Formerly HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited) (“HDFC Life”). CIN: L65110MH2000PLC128245, IRDAI Reg. No. 101 . The name/letters "HDFC" in the name/logo of the company belongs to Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited ("HDFC Limited") and is used by HDFC Life under an agreement entered into with HDFC Limited. ARN EU/04/19/13618
LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
News18 English
News18 » India
1-min read

Rape Accused Can't Be Acquitted Because Survivor Fails to Identify Him in the Dock: Supreme Court

The case dealt with a rape committed on a nine-year-old in Gujarat in 2004.

News18.com

Updated:October 3, 2018, 9:33 AM IST
facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp
Rape Accused Can't Be Acquitted Because Survivor Fails to Identify Him in the Dock: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court of India. (News18 Creative)
Loading...

New Delhi: To not let a criminal trial turn into a “theatre of absurd”, the Supreme Court has ruled that merely because a rape survivor turns hostile and fails to identify the accused in the dock, it would not be a sufficient ground to acquit the accused if there is evidence to prove his guilt otherwise.

“A criminal trial is but a quest for truth,” a Bench of Justices Ranjan Gogoi, Naveen Sinha and KM Joseph declared in a judgment pronounced on September 28.

"It would indeed be a travesty of justice in the peculiar facts of the present case if the appellant (accused) were to be acquitted merely because the prosecutrix (victim) turned hostile and failed to identify the appellant in the dock, in view of the other overwhelming evidence available," the court said.

The case dealt with a rape committed on a nine-year-old in Gujarat in 2004. The case was registered six months after the incident. The child, turning hostile during the trial, deposed that her injuries were due to a fall. However, medical reports and physical examination of her clothes proved rape.

“Neither the accused nor the victim can be permitted to subvert a criminal trial by stating falsehood and resort to contrivances, so as to make it the theatre of the absurd,” the judgment said.

The apex court held that ideally the victim, now married, should face the law for lying in her testimony. However, the bench refrained itself from doing so considering that the survivor was barely nine years old at the time of the incident.

“She may have since been married and settled to a new life, all of which may possibly be jeopardised,” the court ruled.

Get the best of News18 delivered to your inbox - subscribe to News18 Daybreak. Follow News18.com on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok and on YouTube, and stay in the know with what's happening in the world around you – in real time.

Subscribe to Moneycontrol Pro and gain access to curated markets data, trading recommendations, equity analysis, investment ideas, insights from market gurus and much more. Get Moneycontrol PRO for 1 year at price of 3 months. Use code FREEDOM.

Read full article
Loading...
Next Story
Next Story

Also Watch

facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp

Live TV

Loading...
Countdown To Elections Results
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results