Indian Courts Kept Waiting For Fugitive Underworld Don Dawood
Do proceedings in a criminal case cease after an accused's death? According to law, they do, simply because no sentence can be passed against a dead person.
File photo of fugitive underworld don Dawood Ibrahim.
New Delhi: Do proceedings in a criminal case cease after an accused's death? According to law, they do, simply because no sentence can be passed against a dead person.
The man who was struggling with Gangrene and poor health conditions last year may die “scot free” though his career graph starts with a crime in the Karim Lala gang of Mumbai and later stretched over to murders, organised crimes and arms smuggling.
So how exactly did this boy from Dongri in Mumbai become a dreaded criminal? News18 pieces together the cases which will be closed after his death.
After verdicts from the lower and the High courts, an appeal was made in the Supreme Court and a non-bailable warrant was issued against the Don in 1992. The case is still pending and the authorities were hopeful that Dawood would be tried once he is brought back to India.
The court took note of the fact that Dawood had convened a meeting in Dubai to mastermind the conspiracy and later organised the arrangement of arms, ammunition, explosives needed to carry out the attack. This case too shall bite the bust with Dawood never returning back to India.
In July 2013, Indian prosecutors charged bowler S Sreesanth and 38 others with links to organised crime and cheating over their alleged role in spot-fixing in the Indian Premier League (IPL). Delhi police had informed the court that the accused were part of a larger betting syndicate maneuvered and operated by Dawood Ibrahim and his aide Chhota Shakeel. It was stated that the cricketers “knowingly abetted the operation of this international organised crime syndicate.”
If Dawood was to return India now, this case could have been appealed to the higher courts and he could have faced the law for organizing a crime syndicate under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act.
This was not all, there was another blow for Dawood in Septemeber 2016, when Dawood was named in a charge sheet filed by the CBI in 2002 Gutka case. The charge sheet was filed against Dawood and RM Dhariwal, owner of Manikchand Gutka for supplying tobacco and tobacco machines to Pakistan via Dubai. The case was initially investigated by the Mumbai police after a complaint that the complainant’s brother was approached to procure Gutka packets packaging machine worth above Rupees two lakhs and transport them to Dawood’s brother Anees Ibrahim in Karrachi along with his other associates.
Recommended For You
- Apple Offers Rs 3,900 Credit To iPhone Customer Who Paid For Their Out-of-Warranty iPhone Battery Replacement
- IPL 2018: 'Deeply Hurt' Kohli Apologises for RCB's Forgettable Season
- Cargo Review: Martin Freeman Breathes New Life Into Netflix's Aussie Zombie Flick
- Ramazan 2018: 5 Science-Backed Ways How Intermittent Fasting Benefits Everyone
- 5 Reasons Why You Should Buy The OnePlus 6 Over Apple iPhone X