Pakistan Using Jadhav as Propaganda Tool, Violated Vienna Convention on Consular Access: India Tells ICJ
Kulbhusan Jadhav's continued custody without consular access should be declared unlawful, said ex-solicitor general Harish Salve, representing India, at the Hague.
File photo of Kulbhushan Jadhav.
The Hague: India on Monday said the trial of its national Kulbhushan Jadhav by a Pakistani military court "hopelessly failed" to satisfy even the minimum standards of due process and requested the International Court of Justice to declare it â€œunlawfulâ€.
Indiaâ€™s plea came as the top UN court began a four-day public hearing in the case of Jadhav, 48, who was sentenced to death by a Pakistani military court on charges of espionage.
India, during the first day of the hearing, based its case on two broad issues â€” breach of Vienna Convention on consular access and the process of resolution.
â€œIt is an unfortunate case where the life of an innocent Indian is at risk,â€ ex-solicitor general Harish Salve, who was representing India, said.
â€œPakistanâ€™s story is solely based on rhetoric and not facts,â€ he said, adding that Jadhav's continued custody without consular access should be declared unlawful.
Jadhavâ€™s trial by a Pakistani military court "hopelessly failed to satisfy even the minimum standards of due processâ€, Salve said.
No â€œcredible evidence" was provided by Pakistan to show his involvement in any act of terrorism and Jadhav's purported confession clearly appeared to be â€œcoercedâ€, Salve said.
"There is no manner of doubt that Pakistan was using this as a propaganda tool. Pakistan was bound to grant consular access without delay," Salve said.
â€œPakistan used confession document as propaganda. It has disrespected the Vienna Convention,â€ Salve said.
He said India had sent 13 reminders to Pakistan for consular access to Jadhav, but Islamabad is yet to accede.
Pakistan claims that its security forces arrested Jadhav from restive Balochistan province on March 3, 2016, after he reportedly entered from Iran.
However, India maintains that Jadhav was kidnapped from Iran where he had business interests after retiring from the Navy. Jadhav's sentencing had evoked a sharp reaction in India.
During the hearing, Salve said Pakistan filed the FIR almost a month after Jadhavâ€™s arrest.
â€œIn April 2016 an FIR was registered against Jadhav. In May 2016, Jadhav was interrogated and India sent reminders for consular access across May, June, and July,â€ said Salve.
â€œIndia reminded Pakistan for consular access â€” 13 reminders were sent â€” but to no avail,â€ he said.
"Pakistan embarrassed to disclose charges against Jadhav," Salve said.
Pakistan did not inform Kulbhushan Jadhav of his rights, he said.
Salve read out the various sections and articles of the Vienna Convention under which foreign prisoners fall.
â€œThe Vienna Convention is a powerful tool that ensures the facility of consular access to foreign nationals who have been put on trial in foreign trial," he said.
â€œArticle 36 of the Vienna Convention says that a country must be informed about the detention of its citizens but Pakistan did not inform India about his arrest.â€
Without consular access, he said, â€œIndia has no information on what happened to Kulbhushan Jadhav in Pakistan.â€
â€œIndia and Pakistan have a bilateral agreement on consular access,â€ he said.
â€œBilateral treaties cannot modify Article 36 of Vienna Convention. It could only supplement it,â€ Salve added.
Pakistan should have provided a substantial explanation for why it needed three months to provide consular access, upon which it could have claimed that it has complied with treaty obligation, Salve said.
He said Pakistan did not uphold Article 36 of the Vienna Convention that states consular access applies all nationals, regardless of espionage claims in Jadhavâ€™s case.
He said the ICJ had already upheld the importance of consular access under Article 36 in two previous cases â€” LaGrand (Germany vs USA) and Avena (Mexico vs USA).
â€œThis quite plainly, is an egregious violation of Pakistan's obligations under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention," said Salve.
â€œThey at one point said they might consider it if India assisted their investigation into him being an Indian spy, asked for evidence of bank accounts, phone numbers, etc," he said.
Pakistan has not provided any evidence, he added.
â€œInhuman detention violation of universal rights," Salve said.
He said Pakistan offered to allow Jadhav's family to visit him, the terms were agreed and the meeting was held on 25 December, 2017.
"India was dismayed at the manner the meeting with Jadhav's family was conducted and wrote a letter on 27 December marking its protest," he said.
Pakistan didn't send any details of the probe conducted by the Joint Investigation Team before informing the Indian side about the death sentence handed over to him. Jadhav was not appointed any lawyer during his trial by the Pakistani military court either, he said.
Serious charges need strict adherence to due process, Salve said.
Recommended For You
- ‘Breathtaking’: Diver Describes Her Encounter with Human-Sized Barrel Jellyfish
- ICC World Cup 2019 | Rohit And Bumrah Makes It To The ICC World Cup XI
- After Kim Kardashian, Kylie Jenner Imitates Naomi Campbell's Vintage Bikini Runway Look
- Amazon Prime Day Sale: There is a 43-inch Samsung For Rs 28,999 And a Fire TV Stick is Bundled With it
- Amazon Prime Day Sale: Minimal Discounts on Samsung Galaxy Note 9 Unless You Pay With HDFC Cards or Exchange an old Phone