GET Stock QuotesNews18 APP
News18 English
»
1-min read

Passive Euthanasia: Supreme Court Recognises Right to Die With Dignity, Allows 'Living Will' for Terminally-Ill Patients

A Constitution Bench, headed by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, approved “living will” for terminally ill patients. “Individual can decide when to give up life support system. Life support can be removed only after statutory medical board declares patient to be incurable,” the court said.

Utkarsh Anand | CNN-News18

Updated:March 9, 2018, 2:53 PM IST
facebookTwittergoogleskypewhatsapp
Passive Euthanasia: Supreme Court Recognises Right to Die With Dignity, Allows 'Living Will' for Terminally-Ill Patients
Supreme Court of India. (Network18 Creatives)
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday allowed a "living will" authorising the withdrawal of life-support system for patients suffering from terminal and irreversible illnesses. It recognised a person’s right to die with dignity.

A five-judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dipak Misra said passive euthanasia and advance living will are "permissible".

The bench, also comprising justices AK Sikri, AM Khanwilkar, DY Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan also laid down guidelines as to who would execute the will and how the nod for passive euthanasia would be granted by the medical board.

"When the rainbow of life becomes colourless… life becomes still and frozen... sanctity of life is destroyed. Should we not allow them to cross the door and meet the death with dignity? For some, even their death could be moment of celebration,” the bench said.

The apex court said that advance directives for terminally-ill patients could be issued and executed by the next friend and relatives of such person after which a medical board would consider it.

Euthanasia

The top court said that directions and guidelines laid down by it and its directive shall remain in force till a legislation is brought on the issue.

The CJI, while reading out the judgment, said that though there were four separate opinions of the bench but all the judges were unanimous that the 'living will' should be permitted since a person cannot be allowed to continue suffering in a comatose state when he or she doesn't wish to live.

The top court had in 2011 recognised passive euthanasia in Aruna Shanbaug case by which it had permitted withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment from patients not in a position to make an informed decision.

The bench was hearing a PIL filed by NGO Common Cause, saying safeguards were needed while taking a decision by medical boards to withdraw life support of a terminally-ill patient.
On January 15, 2016, the Centre had said the 241st report of the Law Commission stated that passive euthanasia should be allowed with certain safeguards and there was also a proposed law — Medical Treatment of Terminally Ill Patient (Protection of Patients and Medical Practitioners) Bill, 2006.

(With PTI inputs)

Also Watch

| Edited by: Puja Menon
Read full article