Take the pledge to vote

For a better tommorow#AajSawaroApnaKal
  • I agree to receive emails from News18

  • I promise to vote in this year's elections no matter what the odds are.
  • Please check above checkbox.

    SUBMIT

Thank you for
taking the pledge

Vote responsibly as each vote counts
and makes a diffrence

Disclaimer:

Issued in public interest by HDFC Life. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (Formerly HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited) (“HDFC Life”). CIN: L65110MH2000PLC128245, IRDAI Reg. No. 101 . The name/letters "HDFC" in the name/logo of the company belongs to Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited ("HDFC Limited") and is used by HDFC Life under an agreement entered into with HDFC Limited. ARN EU/04/19/13618
LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
News18 English
News18 » India
1-min read

Mirage-2000 Was Bound to Crash, Rues Supreme Court

The court was hearing a PIL for setting up of a court-monitored committee to conduct a thorough inquiry into the February 1 Mirage crash. It also sought that the panel should fix responsibilities of erring government officials.

Utkarsh Anand | CNN-News18

Updated:February 18, 2019, 12:02 PM IST
facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp
Mirage-2000 Was Bound to Crash, Rues Supreme Court
File photo of Mirage 2000 fighter jet,
Loading...

New Delhi: In a grim reminder of Indian forces' imminent need to ramp up the fleet of aircraft and fighter planes, the Supreme Court on Monday observed that the Mirage-2000 trainer aircraft of the Indian Air Force was "bound to crash".

The crash of the trainer aircraft in Bengaluru on February 1 had killed both its pilots.

"When everyone else is using 5th and 6th generation aircrafts, we are using 3rd and 4th generation... what else do you expect? It was bound to crash," regretted Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, heading the bench.

The court was hearing a PIL for setting up of a court-monitored committee, comprising a retired judge of the apex court and experts from defence services, to conduct a thorough inquiry into the Mirage crash. It also sought that the panel should fix responsibilities of erring government officials.

When petitioner-advocate Alakh Alok Srivastava stood up to argue, the CJI asked the lawyer if he was aware which generation aircraft was Mirage-2000 that crashed.

As Srivastava looked for answers, Justice Gogoi said it was perhaps the 4th generation aircraft and then expressed regret by observing that it was bound to crash.

It declined to entertain this PIL and said the court cannot order a judicial inquiry into the incident.

"It was an accident after all. An accident… and hence there is no question of judicial inquiry," said the bench, dismissing the PIL.

Notably, when the CJI was hearing a bunch of PILs against the Rafale deal, it had got the assistance of senior IAF officials to understand the status of the existing fleet and the immediate necessity to upgrade it.

In the final judgment too, the CJI had highlighted the need to improve and upgrade the fleet, saying India cannot remain unprepared in skies when its adversaries have acquired the most modern fighter planes.

Get the best of News18 delivered to your inbox - subscribe to News18 Daybreak. Follow News18.com on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, Telegram, TikTok and on YouTube, and stay in the know with what's happening in the world around you – in real time.

Read full article
Loading...
Next Story
Next Story

Also Watch

facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp

Live TV

Countdown To Elections Results
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results