Take the pledge to vote

For a better tommorow#AajSawaroApnaKal
  • I agree to receive emails from News18

  • I promise to vote in this year's elections no matter what the odds are.
  • Please check above checkbox.

    SUBMIT

Thank you for
taking the pledge

Vote responsibly as each vote counts
and makes a diffrence

Disclaimer:

Issued in public interest by HDFC Life. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (Formerly HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited) (“HDFC Life”). CIN: L65110MH2000PLC128245, IRDAI Reg. No. 101 . The name/letters "HDFC" in the name/logo of the company belongs to Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited ("HDFC Limited") and is used by HDFC Life under an agreement entered into with HDFC Limited. ARN EU/04/19/13618
LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
News18 English
News18 » India
1-min read

No Eatery in Hauz Khas Village Has Sanctioned Building Plan, Says Delhi High Court

A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar made the observation after the south Delhi municipal corporation (SDMC) replied in the negative to a court query whether it had sanctioned a single building plan for an eatery or a pub in the area.

PTI

Updated:January 17, 2018, 8:54 PM IST
facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp
No Eatery in Hauz Khas Village Has Sanctioned Building Plan, Says Delhi High Court
Night life at Hauz Khas Village in New Delhi. Representative image. (Photo: Getty Images)

New Delhi: Not a single restaurant or pub in south Delhi's Hauz Khas Village has taken a sanctioned building plan from the municipal authorities to run their businesses, the Delhi High Court has observed.

A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar made the observation after the South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC) replied in the negative to a court query whether it had sanctioned a single building plan for an eatery or a pub in the area.

"Have you sanctioned even a single building plan for a restaurant," it had asked the SDMC and said, "not one (restaurant) has taken a sanctioned building plan".

The court also said the municipal corporation "does not apply its mind" on whether sufficient space and other facilities for the public are in place when it permits such establishments to come up.

The corporation in its defence said it was not the only one to be blamed for the situation and it was a collective failure of all authorities concerned.

The observations by the bench came during the hearing of arguments in the PILs filed by social activist Pankaj Sharma and advocate Anuja Kapur, who have also alleged that over 120

pubs and restaurants were running in the Hauz Khas Village without any approved building plans or no objection certificate (NOC) from the authorities including the fire department.

The arguments will continue on January 19. The petitioners in their pleas have also alleged that the streets in the village were not wide enough for a fire tender to move easily in case of an emergency. The court had earlier termed the Hauz Khas Village as "a ticking time bomb".

Get the best of News18 delivered to your inbox - subscribe to News18 Daybreak. Follow News18.com on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, Telegram, TikTok and on YouTube, and stay in the know with what's happening in the world around you – in real time.

| Edited by: Ashish Yechury
Read full article
Next Story
Next Story

Also Watch

facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp

Live TV

Countdown To Elections Results
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results