Take the pledge to vote

For a better tommorow#AajSawaroApnaKal
  • I agree to receive emails from News18

  • I promise to vote in this year's elections no matter what the odds are.
  • Please check above checkbox.


Thank you for
taking the pledge

Vote responsibly as each vote counts
and makes a diffrence


Issued in public interest by HDFC Life. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (Formerly HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited) (“HDFC Life”). CIN: L65110MH2000PLC128245, IRDAI Reg. No. 101 . The name/letters "HDFC" in the name/logo of the company belongs to Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited ("HDFC Limited") and is used by HDFC Life under an agreement entered into with HDFC Limited. ARN EU/04/19/13618
LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
News18 English
News18 » India
4-min read

Parliament Passes Economic Offenders Bill to Tighten Noose Around Fraudsters

The Fugitive Economic Offenders Bill, 2018, was passed by a voice vote in the Rajya Sabha on Wednesday. The Lok Sabha had cleared it on July 19.


Updated:July 25, 2018, 10:24 PM IST
facebookTwitter Pocket whatsapp

New Delhi: Parliament on Wednesday passed a bill that seeks to prevent economic offenders such as Vijay Mallya and Nirav Modi from fleeing the country to evade the legal process.

The Fugitive Economic Offenders Bill, 2018, was passed by a voice vote in the Rajya Sabha on Wednesday. The Lok Sabha had cleared it on July 19.

Interim finance minister Piyush Goyal said the instances of people running away and evading the legal process were increasing and this needed to be stopped.

“Criminal law does not allow us to impound their property,” he said. “This bill is an effective, expeditious and constitutional way to stop these offenders from running away. Legislative changes or a new law must be in place to confiscate the assets of such absconders till they don't present themselves before the courts. We will also work out what has to be done with the confiscated assets,” Goyal said.

Soon after the minister moved the bill, chairman M Venkaiah Naidu also said “what is agitating the common man in the country is whether the system is so helpless” in dealing with economic offenders.

Replying to the debate, Goyal said there cannot be a situation when economic offenders run away from the country and also protect their properties. “This bill will deter people from running away. And those who have already fled, they return out of fear of attachment of their properties.” The government is also making efforts to get those accused, who have gone abroad to escape the legal process, extradited, he said.

Rebutting opposition charges that the government had failed to bring back black money, Goyal said, “We are fighting against black money and forcing offenders to face the legal process.”

Justifying the financial limit of Rs 100 crore for invoking the provisions of this new law, Goyal said it was being done to “catch the big offenders and not clog the courts”. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) will be the investigative agency under the Act, he said.

Earlier, while introducing the bill, Goyal said there were provisions of special courts to declare a person a fugitive economic offender in an expeditious manner.

Once a person is a declared offender, his property will be confiscated, managed and disposed of, he said, adding that the attachment of properties would be done in a time-bound manner and effectively.

With opposition members protesting that they did not get copies of amendments moved by one member, the chairman ordered an enquiry into the matter. Naidu, however, said his office had informed him that it was circulated on July 24.

During the debate, the opposition members attacked the government for lack of will to act against the culprits despite having several laws.

Congress member Vivek K Tankha criticised the government saying there was “no shortage of laws in India but they get away because the government does not have the will to stop willful defaulters”. “Is the government's intention to get a lot of publicity by bringing the law,” he asked, initiating the debate, and added that the country will become a "land of legislations" but it "will serve no purpose”.

Tankha said only 10 per cent of black money was outside India and wanted to know what the government had done to get back the 90 per cent within the country. “Why is the government pitching for a threshold of offences worth Rs 100 crore for bringing economic offenders under the purview of the legisalation,” he asked, adding “even offender of Rs 10 crore is bad”.

“People like Lalit Modi, Vijay Mallya, Mehul Choksi and Nirav Modi were involved in economic offences worth Rs 2.4 lakh crore,” he said. “Are we a country that make too many laws with little implementation?” Tankha said and added the real test would be if any fugitive would come back.

Neeraj Shekhar of the Samajwadi Party raised apprehensions on the implementation of the proposed legislation and alleged that several economic offenders have left the country's shores with the active support of the government.

Pointing out that India had extradition treaties with only 47 countries, he asked how the government was planning to bring the offenders back to the country. “Make laws which can be implemented. How much black money has come back to the country in the last four years?” he said.

AIADMK’s A Navaneethakrishnan asked the government to add provisions to increase quantum of punishment as well as fine for economic offenders.

Prasanna Acharya of the BJD, while supporting the bill, said the proposed legislation needs to be legally sustainable. He also said the provision of Rs 100 crore to bring any offender under the ambit of the proposed bill should be removed. Harivansh of the JD(U) said it would be difficult to bring back offenders from various countries due to lack of extradition treaties with such nations.

Elamaram Kareem of the CPI(M) said so many economic offenders were able to leave the country due to the “neo-liberal” regime of the central government. MV Rajeev Gowda from the Congress pointed out that the focus of the proposed legislation should be on preventing the economic offenders from leaving the country rather than bringing them back. He challenged the government to “bring back even one economic offender” to India before 2019.

Ramgopal Yadav of the SP said the law spoke only about punishing those economic offenders who have fled the country but there was a need to investigate those who helped them get big loans from the banks.

Get the best of News18 delivered to your inbox - subscribe to News18 Daybreak. Follow News18.com on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, Telegram, TikTok and on YouTube, and stay in the know with what's happening in the world around you – in real time.

Read full article
Next Story
Next Story

facebookTwitter Pocket whatsapp

Live TV

Countdown To Elections Results
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results