Take the pledge to vote

For a better tommorow#AajSawaroApnaKal
  • I agree to receive emails from News18

  • I promise to vote in this year's elections no matter what the odds are.
  • Please check above checkbox.


Thank you for
taking the pledge

Vote responsibly as each vote counts
and makes a diffrence


Issued in public interest by HDFC Life. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (Formerly HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited) (“HDFC Life”). CIN: L65110MH2000PLC128245, IRDAI Reg. No. 101 . The name/letters "HDFC" in the name/logo of the company belongs to Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited ("HDFC Limited") and is used by HDFC Life under an agreement entered into with HDFC Limited. ARN EU/04/19/13618
LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
News18 English

EXIT Poll Results

Detailed Exit Poll Results
News18 » India
2-min read

Public Servant Must Give Preference to Human Lives Over That of Animals: HC

The Kerala High Court said a public servant, who is on duty, to prevent or obviate danger to human lives caused by a dangerous animal, must give preference to protect the lives of human beings.

Press Trust Of India

Updated:February 13, 2017, 9:33 PM IST
Kerala High Court
File photo of the Kerala High Court.

Kochi: Quashing a lower court order directing payment of compensation to the owner of an elephant killed by a police officer after it ran amok, the Kerala High Court has held that a public servant must give preference to protect the lives of humans, rather than that of animals.

A division bench gave the direction while allowing an appeal by a police officer, relating to him killing a captive elephant to save several human lives during a temple festival in the state.

"A public servant shall never be a coward or a doubting Thomas in such a dangerous circumstance where human life is in peril," the court said in its judgment.

It said a public servant, who is on duty, to prevent or obviate danger to human lives caused by a dangerous animal, must give preference to protect the lives of human beings, which stands guaranteed under the Constitution, rather than that of an animal.

The appeal was filed against a trial court order allowing a suit filed by the owner of the elephant, claiming compensation from the police officer and district magistrate for the killing of the animal.

In its judgment, the High Court said a public servant can shoot an animal to save a human life if he is empowered and authorised to use firearms, but added that "the circumstance must justify the shooting of the animal".

"In other words, if he has no other way to save the lives of human beings, (there is) nothing wrong in shooting the animal so as to kill it in order to save a human life, whatever be the nature of the animal, even if it is a lion. "In such situations, we have no hesitation to hold that preference must be given to human beings rather than animals," it added.

The court also expressed "deep concern and anguish" about the plight of captive elephants and the recurring incidents of killing of several persons and mahouts by such pachyderms during temple/mosque festivals.

"We are of the opinion that processions and exhibitions exposing the captive elephants for a long time to a hostile atmosphere is tantamount to cruelty to the elephants," the court said.

Observing that the Kerala Captive Elephants (Management and Maintenance) Rules, 2003 were not sufficient to prevent cruelty to captive elephants, the court said, "It is high time for the legislature to act for liberating these poor wild animals from the processions and exhibitions in connection with festivals of temples/mosques and allow them to live freely in the jungle."

Get the best of News18 delivered to your inbox - subscribe to News18 Daybreak. Follow News18.com on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, Telegram, TikTok and on YouTube, and stay in the know with what's happening in the world around you – in real time.

| Edited by: Bijaya Das
Read full article
Next Story
Next Story

Also Watch


Live TV

Countdown To Elections Results
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results