LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
News18 English

Sabarimala LIVE: SC Agrees to Hear Review Petitions on Jan 22, No Stay on Order Allowing Women Entry | November 13, 2018, 6:28 PM IST
facebook Twitter skype whatapps
Sabarimala LIVE Updates: The Supreme Court has agreed to hear in open court review petitions challenging its verdict allowing entry of women of all ages into Sabarimala temple. The bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice RF Nariman, Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice Indu Malhotra will hear the 49 petitions on January 22. The court has however not ordered any stay on its earlier verdict allowing women entry into the hill shrine.

Kerala BJP president Sreedharan Pillai has called the Supreme Court’s decision to hear the merits of the 49 review petitions in an open court a victory for the protesters. Earlier in the day, the apex court had said it will begin hearing writ petitions only after orders on the review pleas.
Read More
Nov 13, 2018 6:28 pm (IST)

On Thursday, chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan will chair an All Party Meet to discuss the Sabarimala issue.

Nov 13, 2018 5:32 pm (IST)

 Meanwhile, BJP state President, P S Sreedharan Pillai, described the apex court decision as a "good step". "We accept the spirit of today's Supreme Court decision", he said. The state had witnessed frenzied protests from devotees against the top court's verdict, permitting women of all ages to pray at the shrine. Women in the 10-50 age group had been barred for centuries from visiting and offering prayers as the deity is considered a "Naishtika Brahmachari" (eternal celibate). 

Nov 13, 2018 5:32 pm (IST)

Devaswom minister Kadakkampally Surendran said the government was waiting for details of the judgment. "We have said it earlier also. Whatever decision the Supreme court takes, we will abide by it", he said.

Nov 13, 2018 5:29 pm (IST)

"The blessings of Lord Ayyappa and prayers of lots of devotees are behind this decision to hear the matter in the open court", a beaming Tantri  told reporters. He said the shrine had never faced such troubled times, as first the floods caused immense damage to infrastructure in an around the temple complex and then came the apex court verdict of September 28, permitting women of all ages to offer prayers, at the shrine. "This is a big victory. We believe things will become normal. This is Ayyappa's victory", he said, adding everything would turn positive.

Nov 13, 2018 5:28 pm (IST)

The Sabarimala temple head priest has welcomed the Supreme court's decision to hear review petitions against its judgement on the women's entry issue, in an open court on January 22, saying 'it is a big victory, this is Ayappa's victory. Reacting to the Constitution bench's decision to hear a batch of 50 petitions in the open court, Tantri Kandararu Rajeevaru said today's outcome was due to the blessings of Lord Ayyappa, the presiding deity of the hill shrine.

Nov 13, 2018 5:10 pm (IST)

Chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan has said there will be no stay on Supreme Court's order of September 28 on the entry of women in Sabarimala temple. he said there is no change in the stance and legal experts will be consulted.  

Nov 13, 2018 4:49 pm (IST)

"Protests to continue if govt trying to break the rituals,"RSS leader Valsan Thillankery said after the SC agreed to hear review pleas in Sabarimala temple case on January 22, 2019. 

Nov 13, 2018 4:45 pm (IST)

"It is a judgment welcomed by hypocrites who were aspiring for media headlines. On the merits of the case, as well, the said judgment is absolutely untenable and irrational, if not perverse." Besides the association, several other petitions, including one by the Nair Service Society (NSS), have been filed against the apex court verdict. The NSS had said in the plea that as the deity is a 'Naistika Brahmachari', females below the age of 10 and after the age of 50 years are eligible to worship him and there is no practice of excluding worship by females.

Nov 13, 2018 4:43 pm (IST)

A plea filed by the National Ayyappa Devotees Association (NADA), which has sought review of the verdict, had said: "The notion that the judgment under review is revolutionary, one which removes the stigma or the concept of dirt or pollution associated with menstruation, is unfounded.

Nov 13, 2018 4:42 pm (IST)

The top court had on October 9 declined an urgent hearing on the review plea filed by an association which had contended that the five-judge Constitution bench's verdict lifting the ban was "absolutely untenable and irrational".

Nov 13, 2018 4:37 pm (IST)

The bench stated this while hearing the three fresh petitions filed by G Vijaya Kumar, S Jaya Rajkumar and Shailaja Vijayan challenging its September 28 verdict. On September 28, a five-judge constitution bench headed by then Chief Justice Dipak Misra, in its 4:1 verdict, had paved the way for entry of women of all ages into the Sabarimala Temple saying the ban amounted to gender discrimination.

Nov 13, 2018 4:36 pm (IST)

There are around 48 petitions seeking review of the judgment. Earlier in the day, the top court had made it clear that fresh pleas related to the Sabarimala Temple will be heard only after it decides the earlier petitions seeking review of the judgment allowing entry of women of all age groups into the shrine in Kerala.

Nov 13, 2018 4:34 pm (IST)

Kerala chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan has said that the Supreme Court order of September 28 will be implemented.  "Government will decide the new developments," said Kodiyeri Balakrishnan, CPM state secretary. 

Nov 13, 2018 4:32 pm (IST)

The Kerala chief minister is holding a meeting to review preparations for Sabarimala temple.  The SC order to hear review pleas will also be discussed. The meeting is being attended by Devaswom minister Kadakampally Surendran. 

Nov 13, 2018 4:20 pm (IST)

"I will go to Sabarimala between 16th November to 20th November," said Trupti Desai, a gender equality activist. She said she will announce the date tomorrow. Desai is known for her fight to allow women enter religious places. 

Nov 13, 2018 4:13 pm (IST)

The Supreme Court in its order has said, "All the Review Petitions along with all pending applications will be heard in Open Court on 22nd January,  2019 before the appropriate Bench.  We make it clear that there is no stay of the judgment and order of this Court dated 28th September, 2018."

Nov 13, 2018 4:08 pm (IST)

No Stay on Sept 28 Order | The Supreme Court  says there will be no stay on its verdict which allowed entry of women of all age groups in Sabarimala temple.

Nov 13, 2018 4:04 pm (IST)

The Kerala government, which had vowed to implement the SC verdict, said it has not yet decided what to do and would only react after reading Tuesday’s order in detail. Trvancore Devaswom Board has said it will decide on further course of action after consulting the state government. 

Nov 13, 2018 4:01 pm (IST)

On January 22, 2019, the Supreme Court will decide whether to admit the 49 review pleas against its September 28 verdict on the entry of women to Sabarimala temple or not. 

Nov 13, 2018 3:54 pm (IST)

Kerala BJP president Sreedharan Pillai has called the Supreme Court’s decision to hear the merits of the 49 review petitions in an open court a victory for the protesters, who had been opposing the entry of women in the 10-50 age group. 

Nov 13, 2018 3:52 pm (IST)

Supreme Court has agreed to hear 49 review petitions in open court. The review petition will be heard in open court on January 22, 2019. 

Nov 13, 2018 3:47 pm (IST)

Supreme Court has agreed to hear review pleas in Sabarimala case.  Earlier, a review plea by the Nair Service Society (NSS), one of the petitioners, had said "without holding that the questions raised related to matters of religion which are not within judicially manageable standards, the majority decision in substance has the effect of holding that the character of the deity can be altered based on individual faith and belief, in violation of the tenets of a particular religion and or religious sect".

Nov 13, 2018 3:39 pm (IST)

Earlier in the day, the Special Commissioner’s report in Kerala high court stated that several persons had assembled at Sabarimala on November 5 to prevent entry of women. A woman devotee, who was aged above 50 years, was subjected to harassment and intimidation when she attempted to visit temple. She could visit temple only with police assistance. The report also stated that persons happened to ascend the holy 18 steps without the customary “irumudi kettu” in the midst of commotion, leading to breach of temple customs. “Irumudi Ketti” is a travel pouch containing pooja articles and a person can ascend the holy steps only by carrying it on head. The Report recommended that political parties and religious outfits should be directed to withdraw from staging protests in Sabarimala. The Report also highlighted the grievances of devotees regarding lack of adequate facilities and police arrangements.

Nov 13, 2018 3:34 pm (IST)

The centuries old restrictions on entry of women devotees between the 10-50 age group worshipping in the shrine had been lifted by the Supreme Court on September 28. With the CPI(M)-led Left Democratic Front government making it clear that it was constitutionally bound to implement the verdict, devotees and right wing outfits had launched massive protests and prayer marches against entry of young women. Over 3,700 people had been arrested for violence during Sabarimala protests across the state after the apex court ruling.

Nov 13, 2018 3:28 pm (IST)

Sabarimala: Hearing Begins in SC | Supreme Court has begun hearing 49 review petitions in Sabarimala case. The batch of petitions is seeking review of the judgment has been taken up for consideration in-chamber by a bench of Chief Justice Gogoi and justices R F Nariman, A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra.

Nov 13, 2018 3:24 pm (IST)

Sabarimala: RECAP of What Happened in Kerala HC Today | The Kerala high court has taken suo moto case on violence which took place at Sabarimala on November 5, when the temple opened for ‘Chithira Aatta Vishesham’. The Special Bench for Devaswom matters comprising Justices P R Ramachandra Menon and N Anilkumar took cognizance on the basis of the report filed by Special Commissioner M Manoj District Judge.

Nov 13, 2018 3:17 pm (IST)

Sabarimala: What is an in-chamber Hearing? |  The Sabarimala review petitions will be heard in chambers of the CJI and there will not be an open court hearing. The apex court usually hears review petitions inside a chamber where no advocates are present. The hearing takes place inside judges' chamber to resolve procedural issues when court is not in session.

Nov 13, 2018 3:00 pm (IST)

CLICK TO READ | 'Lord Ayyappa Wasn't Anti-Women': Despite Threats, Kollam Woman Begins Sabarimala Journey

The trouble began on Tuesday evening when Karunagappally native Archana K Rajan, who goes by the name of Soorya Devarchana on Facebook, revealed her wish to visit Lord Ayyappa's temple in Sabarimala.

Nov 13, 2018 2:59 pm (IST)

Sabarimala: 'No Devotee, Media Person Should be Blocked from Visiting Temple' | The Kerala High Court had earlier in November said that devotees and media personnel should not be blocked from visiting the Sabarimala temple and the government should not interfere in the day-to-day activities of the shrine. The court’s remarks came on the day when the Lord Ayyappa shrine was scheduled to re-open for a special ‘puja’. Frenzied protests had rocked the temple last month and around a dozen women in the age group of 10-50 were prevented from reaching the shrine as protesting devotees sought to “protect” their customs and beliefs.The situation led to a pitched battle between police and the agitators as thousands took to the streets against the decision of the LDF government to implement the court orders. Taking note of the violent protests, the court said a department-level inquiry must be ordered to check the role of policemen who had damaged devotees’ vehicles.

Nov 13, 2018 2:55 pm (IST)

CLICK TO READ | Mob Attacks News18 Woman Journalist, Others Covering Sabarimala Protests as Cops Look On

Two reporters - one from The News Minute and one from the Republic TV - were also attacked by the anti-women protesters.

Load More
Sabarimala LIVE: SC Agrees to Hear Review Petitions on Jan 22, No Stay on Order Allowing Women Entry
Representative Image

The Kerala High Court, meanwhile, on Tuesday took suo moto cognisance of the violence at Sabarimala Temple after the Supreme Court opened the gates of the shrine to women of all age groups. It has also sought an explanation from the Travancore Devaswom Board.

The SC verdict had led to violent protests at the base camps outside the hill shrine as devotees and several Hindu outfits blocked women from entering the temple when it opened for six days in October.

As the hearings began, a lawyer sought to file a fresh affidavit by a ‘tantri’, asking for open court hearing. Reacting to the same, the CJI said: “You are being unfair to us. Beyond that, we don't want to say anything.”

At least 12 women in the 10-50 age group had made a failed attempt to trek the hills and had to return following the protests. Even women over the age of 50 were stopped at Sabarimala and were only allowed to pass through after showing proof of their age.

The BJP and the Congress both blamed the Pinarayi Vijayan government in Kerala for implementing the verdict in a “hurry” and are taking out protest rallies through the state to protect the “traditions and customs” of the temple. However, the Left government has reiterated that the administration is committed to implementing the court’s September 28 order, but blamed political rivals for politicising the issue.

A review plea by the Nair Service Society (NSS), one of the petitioners, said "without holding that the questions raised related to matters of religion which are not within judicially manageable standards, the majority decision in substance has the effect of holding that the character of the deity can be altered based on individual faith and belief, in violation of the tenets of a particular religion and or religious sect". The petitioners have also alleged that the verdict has "legal errors" and the assumption of the temple practice being based on notions of menstrual impurity is "factually erroneous".

  • 29 Nov - 02 Dec, 2019 | Pakistan in Australia
    AUS vs PAK
    127.0 overs
    94.4 overs
    Australia beat Pakistan by an innings and 48 runs
  • 29 Nov - 03 Dec, 2019 | England in New Zealand
    NZ vs ENG
    129.1 overs
    162.5 overs
    New Zealand drew with England
  • 27 - 29 Nov, 2019 | Afghanistan and West Indies in India
    AFG vs WI
    68.3 overs
    83.3 overs
    West Indies beat Afghanistan by 9 wickets
  • 22 - 24 Nov, 2019 | Bangladesh in India
    BAN vs IND
    30.3 overs
    89.4 overs
    India beat Bangladesh by an innings and 46 runs
  • 21 - 24 Nov, 2019 | Pakistan in Australia
    PAK vs AUS
    86.2 overs
    157.4 overs
    Australia beat Pakistan by an innings and 5 runs
Countdown To Elections Results
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results
Listen to the latest songs, only on