Take the pledge to vote

For a better tommorow#AajSawaroApnaKal
  • I agree to receive emails from News18

  • I promise to vote in this year's elections no matter what the odds are.
  • Please check above checkbox.

    SUBMIT

Thank you for
taking the pledge

Vote responsibly as each vote counts
and makes a diffrence

Disclaimer:

Issued in public interest by HDFC Life. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (Formerly HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited) (“HDFC Life”). CIN: L65110MH2000PLC128245, IRDAI Reg. No. 101 . The name/letters "HDFC" in the name/logo of the company belongs to Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited ("HDFC Limited") and is used by HDFC Life under an agreement entered into with HDFC Limited. ARN EU/04/19/13618
LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
News18 English
News18 » India
1-min read

SC Spares Man Life in Jail, Lets Him Walk Free as He Was 7 Months Under 18 When He Committed Murder

Dharmendra had moved a plea in the apex court, claiming he was a juvenile and hence he could not have been convicted as an adult by the trial court in 1999.

Utkarsh Anand | CNN-News18

Updated:December 28, 2018, 9:53 AM IST
facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp
SC Spares Man Life in Jail, Lets Him Walk Free as He Was 7 Months Under 18 When He Committed Murder
A file photo of the Supreme Court. (PTI)

New Delhi: Twenty two years after the murder, a man has been set free by the Supreme Court because he was a minor at the time of committing the crime.

The top court came to the rescue of Dharmendra as it first recalled its order of 2014 when his appeal was dismissed along with another convict in the case.

Dharmendra had later moved a plea claiming he was a juvenile and hence he could not have been convicted as an adult by the trial court in 1999.

Subsequently, the court also agreed to examine his plea that he could not have been handed a life sentence.

The court then sought a report from the District and Sessions Judge, Guna, Madhya Pradesh, who was asked to conduct an inquiry into the juvenility of Dharmendra.

In his report, the sessions judge concluded that the convict’s date of birth is June 3, 1979. Therefore, as on November 1, 1996 when he committed the murder, his age was 17 years, 4 months and 29 days.

On receiving the report, the Supreme Court held: “It is clear that the appellant was therefore, not liable to be convicted under the Indian Penal code read with Code of Criminal Procedure. The appellant's case could have been dealt with only under the Juvenile Justice Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000.”

A bench headed by Justice SA Bobde noted that there is no dispute that Dharmendra’s case would be governed by the 2000 Act.

“Having regard to the provisions of the Act of 2000, we are of the view that the sentence of life imprisonment awarded to the appellant needs to be set aside and hereby set aside vide Section 16 of the Act of 2000,” ordered the bench.

It then noted that the convict cannot be placed under the supervision of a probation officer anymore since he has already served almost 5 years in jail and the Juvenile Justice Act provides that a delinquent cannot be placed under supervision of a probation officer for a period exceeding 3 years. The court the ordered immediate release of Dharmendra from the prison in MP’s Guna.

Get the best of News18 delivered to your inbox - subscribe to News18 Daybreak. Follow News18.com on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, Telegram, TikTok and on YouTube, and stay in the know with what's happening in the world around you – in real time.

Read full article
Next Story
Next Story

Also Watch

facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp

Live TV

Countdown To Elections Results
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results