Take the pledge to vote

For a better tommorow#AajSawaroApnaKal
  • I agree to receive emails from News18

  • I promise to vote in this year's elections no matter what the odds are.
  • Please check above checkbox.

    SUBMIT

Thank you for
taking the pledge

Vote responsibly as each vote counts
and makes a diffrence

Disclaimer:

Issued in public interest by HDFC Life. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (Formerly HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited) (“HDFC Life”). CIN: L65110MH2000PLC128245, IRDAI Reg. No. 101 . The name/letters "HDFC" in the name/logo of the company belongs to Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited ("HDFC Limited") and is used by HDFC Life under an agreement entered into with HDFC Limited. ARN EU/04/19/13618
LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
»
1-min read

SC's 9-Judge Bench to Rule if Privacy is a Fundamental Right

Once the nine-judge bench decides the sanctity of the right to privacy, the case will come back to the five-judge bench to examine petitioners' allegation that Aadhaar breaches right to privacy.

Utkarsh Anand | CNN-News18

Updated:July 18, 2017, 7:23 PM IST
facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp
SC's 9-Judge Bench to Rule if Privacy is a Fundamental Right
File photo of the Supreme Court of India.
Loading...

New Delhi: A nine-judge bench is set to rule whether there is a fundamental right to privacy under the Indian Constitution.

The issue requires to be settled after 67 years of a Constitution Bench judgment as a clutch of petitions has claimed Aadhaar violates right to privacy.

With right to privacy being pitched as a fundamental right by the petitioners, a five-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India J S Khehar on Tuesday referred the contentious issue to a nine-judge bench for an authoritative ruling.

The nine judges on the bench are CJI JS Khehar, J Chelameswar, S A Bobde, R K Agarwal, Rohinton F Nariman, Abhay Manohar Sapre, D Y Chandrachud, Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Abdul Nazeer.

Since an eight-judge bench verdict of 1950 held there is no fundamental right to privacy, the CJI-led court on Tuesday decided to get the subject examined by a larger bench.

“Right to privacy is a very, very important issue. It is essential to decide whether there is fundamental right to privacy,” said the CJI.

The bench added that the correctness of the two previous judgments in cases of MP Sharma (1950) and Khadak Singh (1960) will be scutinised by the nine-judge bench.

This bench will sit on Wednesday and is likely to conclude the hearing in a day. Once the nine-judge bench decides the sanctity of the right to privacy, the case will come back to the five-judge bench to examine petitioners' allegation that Aadhaar breaches right to privacy.

During the hearing, Attorney General K K Venugopal submitted that the court has to first decide whether it wishes to deal with arguments on the right to privacy. “And if this court wants to examine whether right to privacy is a fundamental right or not, it will have to go to a nine-judge bench since there is already a judgment on this point by an eight-judge bench,” said the AG.

Appearing for the petitioners, senior advocates Shyam Divan, Gopal Subramanium and Arvind Datar submitted it was incumbent to consider right to privacy as a fundamental right and therefore, a larger bench could take a call.

At this, the CJI observed that it was appropriate to refer this issue to a nine-judge bench and after a decision by the larger bench, the matter could be decided by the five judges.

| Edited by: Swati Sharma
Read full article
Loading...
Next Story
Next Story

Also Watch

facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp

Live TV

Loading...
Countdown To Elections Results
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results