Take the pledge to vote

For a better tommorow#AajSawaroApnaKal
  • I agree to receive emails from News18

  • I promise to vote in this year's elections no matter what the odds are.
  • Please check above checkbox.

    SUBMIT

Thank you for
taking the pledge

Vote responsibly as each vote counts
and makes a diffrence

Disclaimer:

Issued in public interest by HDFC Life. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (Formerly HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited) (“HDFC Life”). CIN: L65110MH2000PLC128245, IRDAI Reg. No. 101 . The name/letters "HDFC" in the name/logo of the company belongs to Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited ("HDFC Limited") and is used by HDFC Life under an agreement entered into with HDFC Limited. ARN EU/04/19/13618
LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
»
1-min read

No Reservation for SC/ST in Education, Jobs After Migrating to Another State, Rules SC

The SC said a person notified as a Scheduled Caste in State 'A' cannot claim the same status in another State on the basis that he is declared as a Scheduled Caste in State 'A'.

Utkarsh Anand | CNN-News18

Updated:August 30, 2018, 6:47 PM IST
facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp
No Reservation for SC/ST in Education, Jobs After Migrating to Another State, Rules SC
A file photo of the Supreme Court. (PTI)
Loading...

New Delhi: A member of the SC/ST community does not carry the same status upon migrating to another state and cannot thus get the benefit of quota there, the Supreme Court has ruled.

A Constitution Bench, headed by Justice Ranjan Gogoi, concurred with the views taken by the apex court in the past.

“Unhesitatingly, it can be said that a person belonging to a Scheduled Caste in one state cannot be deemed to be a Scheduled Caste person in relation to any other state to which he migrates for the purpose of employment or education,” said the Bench.

It added that the benefits of reservation provided for by the Constitution would stand confined to the geographical territories of a state/Union Territory in respect of which the lists of SC/ST have been notified by the Presidential Orders.

"A person notified as a Scheduled Caste in State 'A' cannot claim the same status in another State on the basis that he is declared as a Scheduled Caste in State 'A'...," it maintained.

The Court added that if a member of SC/ST gets the benefit of that status throughout the territory of India, the expression "in relation to that State" under the Constitutional provisions would become nugatory.

The Bench noted that the mandate of Article 341 and 342 for notifying classes as SC and ST would get compromised if the special privileges or the rights granted to SCs and STs in a particular state are to be made available in all the states and if such benefits are to be carried from state ‘A’ to state ‘B’ on migration.

Such reservation, the court said, is to be provided on the basis of quantifiable data indicating the adequacy or inadequacy, as may be, of the representation of such classes in Government service.

“The data which is the basis of the satisfaction of the State being verifiable, is open to judicial scrutiny on the limited ground of relevance of the circumstances on which the satisfaction is moulded,” added the Bench.

For the purposed of subordinate services in Delhi, the Bench ruled that recruitment to all positions is on an All India basis and reservation provided for, is again, a pan¬ India reservation.

| Edited by: Aakarshuk Sarna
Read full article
Loading...
Next Story
Next Story

Also Watch

facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp

Live TV

Loading...
Countdown To Elections Results
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results