Take the pledge to vote

For a better tommorow#AajSawaroApnaKal
  • I agree to receive emails from News18

  • I promise to vote in this year's elections no matter what the odds are.
  • Please check above checkbox.

    SUBMIT

Thank you for
taking the pledge

Vote responsibly as each vote counts
and makes a diffrence

Disclaimer:

Issued in public interest by HDFC Life. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (Formerly HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited) (“HDFC Life”). CIN: L65110MH2000PLC128245, IRDAI Reg. No. 101 . The name/letters "HDFC" in the name/logo of the company belongs to Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited ("HDFC Limited") and is used by HDFC Life under an agreement entered into with HDFC Limited. ARN EU/04/19/13618
LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
News18 English
»
2-min read

Senior Lawyers Engage in War of Words Over Trivial Issue During Ayodhya Hearing

As soon as the special bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra assembled at 2 PM to hear the case, the spat began apparently on a trivial issue after ASG Maninder Singh asked Dhavan, who was standing to start advancing arguments, to move a bit.

PTI

Updated:April 6, 2018, 10:17 PM IST
facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp
Senior Lawyers Engage in War of Words Over Trivial Issue During Ayodhya Hearing
A file photo of the Supreme Court. (PTI)
Loading...

New Delhi: The hearing in the sensitive Babri Masjid-Ram Temple land dispute case on Friday saw a heated exchange of words in the Supreme Court between senior lawyer Rajeev Dhavan and two Additional Solicitors General (ASGs) -- Maninder Singh and Tushar Mehta.

As soon as the special bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra assembled at 2 PM to hear the case, the spat began apparently on a trivial issue after ASG Singh asked Dhavan, who was standing to start advancing arguments, to move a bit.

"Sit down, Mr Maninder Singh. Sit down," Dhavan said at top of his voice, leading the ASG to retort by saying "behave yourself, Mr Dhavan".

"Don't talk nonsense," Dhavan said. "You are talking nonsense," ASG Singh retorted, adding that he was extending regard to him (Dhavan) due to his seniority.

ASG Mehta then came in support of his colleague and said, "There are people who are arrogant. With due respect to the learned senior counsel (Dhavan), he seems to have undergone a course in it."

"Why are they sitting next to me and murmuring away and murmuring away", Dhavan told the bench, apparently complaining about the law officers.

"Why are you standing near us? There is enough space there," Mehta told Dhavan.

They (ASGs) came and said that they are the law officers, he said and then referred to his past experience when noted jurist Nani Palkhivala had vacated the chair for the counsel to argue the case.

The bench, also comprising justices Ashok Bhushan and S A Nazeer, said that lawyers are supposed to vacate seats for the counsel for litigants.

As the hearing progressed, Dhavan made some uncharitable comments against former Attorney General and senior advocate K Parasaran, appearing for a Hindu group, who opposed his (Dhavan's) submission that the Ayodhya case be referred to the larger bench.

"I am not indulging in theatrics and drama like Mr Parasaran. He suddenly gets up and says things," Dhavan said and also used the word 'rubbish'.

Senior Counsel C S Vaidyanathan and ASG Mehta took strong objection to the language used by Dhavan against Parasaran and said now a tendency has emerged among some lawyers to browbeat the institution and they are trying to "vitiate the atmosphere".

"What kind of language is being used," Vaidyanathan asked and added that it seemed that Dhavan did not want to argue the case.

The bench also reminded Dhavan that Parasaran was the former Attorney General of India.

The law officers and some other lawyers took strong note of Dhavan's other submission that the nation wanted to know as to why the apex court referred the polygamy issue to the larger bench and not doing the same with the Ayodhya case.

"What kind of argument is this? How can he make such an argument? That (polygamy) was the separate case," Vaidyanathan said.

Dhavan would resume advancing arguments in the case on April 27.

| Edited by: Ashish Yechury
Read full article
Loading...
Next Story
Next Story

Also Watch

facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp
 
 

Live TV

Loading...
Countdown To Elections Results
  • 01 d
  • 12 h
  • 38 m
  • 09 s
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results