Take the pledge to vote

For a better tommorow#AajSawaroApnaKal
  • I agree to receive emails from News18

  • I promise to vote in this year's elections no matter what the odds are.
  • Please check above checkbox.

    SUBMIT

Thank you for
taking the pledge

Vote responsibly as each vote counts
and makes a diffrence

Disclaimer:

Issued in public interest by HDFC Life. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (Formerly HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited) (“HDFC Life”). CIN: L65110MH2000PLC128245, IRDAI Reg. No. 101 . The name/letters "HDFC" in the name/logo of the company belongs to Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited ("HDFC Limited") and is used by HDFC Life under an agreement entered into with HDFC Limited. ARN EU/04/19/13618
LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
News18 English
News18 » India
1-min read

States Can't be Compelled to Give Jobs, Admissions Under EWS Quota Law: Centre in SC

The Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment was responding to a PIL that sought quota benefits for EWS in states of Tamil Nadu and Karnataka.

Utkarsh Anand | CNN-News18

Updated:January 7, 2020, 4:07 PM IST
facebookTwitter Pocket whatsapp
States Can't be Compelled to Give Jobs, Admissions Under EWS Quota Law: Centre in SC
File photo of a job fair. (Representative image: PTI)

New Delhi: The central government has submitted in the Supreme Court that it cannot compel states to give reservation benefits to economically weaker sections (EWS) in jobs and education there.

In its affidavit, the Centre maintained that it is completely up to the state governments to dole out quota benefits for EWS in terms of the recent constitutional amendments.

The stand of the central government is significant, for it makes it clear that despite the amendments in favour of the EWS, it will be for the states to take a call whether they want to extend benefits of public employments and admissions in state-run educational institutions to the economically deprived classes or not.

The Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment was responding to a PIL that sought quota benefits for EWS in states of Tamil Nadu and Karnataka.

Supreme Court lawyer GS Mani had complained that these two states did not show any action in implementing the 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 2019, providing 10 per cent reservation for EWS.

Replying to Mani's petition, the ministry stated that the amendments for EWS were brought in with the objective of promoting the welfare of poor persons not covered under the existing scheme of reservation for the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Socially and Educationally Backward Classes.

But it added: "Whether or not to provide reservation to the EWS of the society for appointment in state government jobs and for admission to state government educational institutions, as per provisions of the newly inserted Articles 15(6) and 16(6), is to be decided by the concerned state government."

Steering clear of the controversy, the Centre said that the department of Social Justice and Empowerment had no role on deciding the reservation policy of any state government.

The affidavit clarified that the Centre has no role to play for in jobs under the state governments and educational institutions being run by them.

Get the best of News18 delivered to your inbox - subscribe to News18 Daybreak. Follow News18.com on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, Telegram, TikTok and on YouTube, and stay in the know with what's happening in the world around you – in real time.

Read full article
Next Story
Next Story

facebookTwitter Pocket whatsapp

Live TV

Countdown To Elections Results
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results