Take the pledge to vote

For a better tommorow#AajSawaroApnaKal
  • I agree to receive emails from News18

  • I promise to vote in this year's elections no matter what the odds are.
  • Please check above checkbox.


Thank you for
taking the pledge

Vote responsibly as each vote counts
and makes a diffrence


Issued in public interest by HDFC Life. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (Formerly HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited) (“HDFC Life”). CIN: L65110MH2000PLC128245, IRDAI Reg. No. 101 . The name/letters "HDFC" in the name/logo of the company belongs to Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited ("HDFC Limited") and is used by HDFC Life under an agreement entered into with HDFC Limited. ARN EU/04/19/13618
LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
News18 English

EXIT Poll Results

Detailed Exit Poll Results
News18 » India
1-min read

Supreme Court Quashes Contempt Action Against Journalists

The Supreme Court on Monday set aside a contempt ruling against four journalists for articles about former Chief Justice of India Y K Sabharwal.

Ashok Bagriya | CNN-News18

Updated:January 2, 2017, 7:42 PM IST
Supreme Court Quashes Contempt Action Against Journalists
File photo of the Supreme Court building.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday set aside a contempt ruling against four journalists for articles about former Chief Justice of India Y K Sabharwal.

The four journalists were subjected to a suo moto contempt of court case by the Delhi High Court against a story that appeared in daily ‘Mid-Day’ on 2nd May, 2007, titled “Injustice”. The court had held the editor and other staff members guilty of contempt.

The SC set aside that verdict holding that it exceeded its jurisdiction in dealing with the contempt of a superior court.

A bench of Chief Justice T S Thakur and Justice A M Khanwilkar said the high court did not have the jurisdiction to pass such an order as it was not empowered to punish for the contempt of a superior court which itself was not invoking such power despite being vested with it.

The article had alleged misuse of the official residence of Justice Sabharwal who demitted office as Chief Justice of India on 13th January, 2007, by the same being shown as the registered office of three companies promoted by Justice Sabharwal’s sons. A second story published on 18th May, 2007, in Mid-Day pointed out that Sabharwal’s son had entered into a partnership with shopping malls and commercial complex developers just before Sabharwal passed orders for sealing of commercial 2 Page 3 establishments running in residential areas in different parts of Delhi.

This, according to the story, benefitted the partnership business of Sabharwal’s sons. On 19th May, 2007, a third story that quoted some senior lawyer’s saying that if the facts about Sabharwal’s sons’ partnership business benefitting from the orders Sabharwal’s bench were true, then Sabharwal should not have heard the case.

Get the best of News18 delivered to your inbox - subscribe to News18 Daybreak. Follow News18.com on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, Telegram, TikTok and on YouTube, and stay in the know with what's happening in the world around you – in real time.

| Edited by: Ashish Yechury
Read full article
Next Story
Next Story

Also Watch


Live TV

Countdown To Elections Results
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results