GET Stock QuotesNews18 APP
News18 English
4-min read

The National Family Health Survey Has Shown NHM to be a Success, Say Experts

The 10 years between NFHS 4 and NFHS 3, saw the ambitious NHM and its crucial rural segment, the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), unfold, making the latest survey a comment on the Mission’s outcomes.

Aradhna Wal |

Updated:January 14, 2018, 5:46 PM IST
The National Family Health Survey Has Shown NHM to be a Success, Say Experts
Representative image. (Reuters)
New Delhi: The final report of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS) 4, published January 12, is a stamp of approval for the National Health Mission (NHM), according to experts.

The 10 years between NFHS 4 and NFHS 3, saw the ambitious NHM and its crucial rural segment, the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), unfold, making the latest survey a comment on the Mission’s outcomes.

A health researcher, with over 10 years of experience in the field, told News18 that some of the data showed how social interventions of the NHM, instead of just direct health interventions, worked to better India’s key indicators.

The report reveals the successful interventions of health, literacy and awareness, especially in women, who form a bulk of the NFHS 4’s 803211 sample size. The sample size of 568,200 households is substantially more than the 109,000 households in NFHS 3.

This solved the conundrum of lowered use of contraceptives and lowered fertility rates that was puzzled public health professionals, as seen in the fact sheets published much before the report.

Data from the fact sheets showed that the use of contraceptives or any family planning methods had gone down by from 56.3 percent to 53.5 percent. Use of contraceptives has a traditionally inverse relationship with total fertility rates (TFR). However, the TFR has reduced to 2.2 children per women, from 2.7 in 2005-2006. The successful lowering of TFR, and 1 percent reduction in the unmet family planning needs, can be ascribed to literacy, which has gone up among women.

The number of children per woman declines with women’s level of schooling, the data shows. NFHS 4 shows that the percentage of literate women, between the ages of 15 to 49, is 68.4 percent, as compared to 55.1 in NFHS 3. The percentage of women above the ages of 6, who had ever been to school went up to 68.8 percent, from 58.3 percent.

The percentage of women with ten or more years of schooling has gone up substantially, from 22.3 percent to 35.7 percent.

Women with no schooling have an average 3.1 children, compared with 1.7 children for women with 12 or more years of schooling.

India no longer has a population explosion problem, said the researcher, speaking anonymously, as the TFR of 23 states and union territories is below the replacement rate of 2.1. This replacement rate is the level of fertility at which a population exactly replaces itself from one generation to the next. Sikkim, the report shows, has gone down to 1.2 children per women.

Most women, added the researcher, were having babies when they wanted to, and were making some interventions to prevent unwanted pregnancies, as the difference between the two is down by 50 percent. The survey shows that 91 percent of births in the five years before the survey, were wanted.

Women educated up to the 10th standard, had their first baby at the median age of 20-21, and women educated up to the 12th standard had their first baby at the median age of 25-26. That almost five gap has a major, positive impact on the health of the mother. It also encourages spacing between babies, which should ideally be 32 months or more. Babies born with less than 24 months gap run a high risk of malnutrition, the effects of which last a lifetime, and adversely impact the mother’s health.

It’s not just the direct interventions aimed at population control – such as family planning methods and contraceptive kits – that are working. With increasing literacy and the resultant awareness and empowerment of women to make sexual health and reproductive choices, social determinants are changing.

The NHM was launched in 2005 with a mandate was to setup accessible health infrastructure and to move a certain part of healthcare from the hands of doctors to those of frontline health workers, i.e ASHAs, responsible for monitoring the health of all households in their area and for spreading information and awareness. The positive indicators show that these two have, to a degree, succeeded. Where TFR numbers are high, such as Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, they are so because of lack of access and marriages of girls under the age of 18, who are known to have very little control in reproductive choices. There is a high rate of teenage pregnancies in rural areas, 1 out of 10 teenage wives between the ages of 15 and 19 have begun childbearing. Though the number of teenage pregnancies is down from NFHS 3 -- 16 percent to 8 percent -- there are still enough women without access to or a choice in safe reproductive healthcare.

NHRM facilities have also made a large number of institutional births a reality, a statistic that stands out in the report. The percentage of women who deliver babies in health facilities has jumped from 38.7 percent in NFHS 3, to 78.9 percent. Public hospitals and healthcare centres have admittedly had problems with quality of care, and the treatment meted out by staff to poor patients. However, medical care also ensures that women don’t die from haemorrhaging and babies from sepsis and asphyxiation, the most common causes of deaths. Hence, the infant mortality rate has come down to 41 deaths per 1000 live births, from 57.

Also Watch

| Edited by: Ashish Yechury
Read full article
Next Story
Next Story