Home » News » India » ‘Two-Finger Test Re-traumatises Rape Survivors, Affront to Dignity’: SC on ‘Patriarchal, Sexist’ Practice | Top Quotes
2-MIN READ

‘Two-Finger Test Re-traumatises Rape Survivors, Affront to Dignity’: SC on ‘Patriarchal, Sexist’ Practice | Top Quotes

By: Sanya Talwar

Edited By: Manjiri Joshi

LawBeat

Last Updated: October 31, 2022, 20:22 IST

New Delhi, India

The Supreme Court had deemed the practice unconstitutional in 2013. (File)

The Supreme Court had deemed the practice unconstitutional in 2013. (File)

Two-finger test involves insertion of two fingers into a woman’s vagina to measure laxity of muscles and determine ‘virginity’. It is based on patriarchal assumption that a sexually active woman is less likely to have been sexually assaulted​

The Supreme Court on Monday ordered a ban on “two-finger test" in rape cases and warned that persons conducting such tests will be held guilty of misconduct.

The two-finger test is an unscientific and intrusive physical examination that involves insertion of two fingers into a woman’s vagina to measure the laxity of muscles and determine her ‘virginity’. It is based on the patriarchal assumption that a woman who is sexually active is less likely to have been sexually assaulted; several judgments and research have shown that a person’s sexual history has no bearing on sexual assault.

The Supreme Court had deemed the practice unconstitutional in 2013 and held that the test should not be performed.

A look at the observations of the bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud and Hima Kohli on the test:

  • The Supreme Court deprecates the use of this regressive and invasive test in cases alleging rape and sexual assault. This so-called test has no scientific basis.
  • Two-finger test neither proves nor disproves allegations of rape.
  • Two-finger test re-victimises and re-traumatises women who may have been sexually assaulted, and is an affront to their dignity.
  • The Supreme Court reiterates its observation in Lillu vs. State of Haryana (2013) that the two-finger test violates the right to privacy, integrity, and dignity.
  • Whether a woman is “habituated to sexual intercourse” or “habitual to sexual intercourse” is irrelevant for the purposes of determining whether the ingredients of Section 375 (rape) of the IPC are present
  • The test based on “incorrect assumption” that a sexually active woman cannot be raped.
  • Probative value of a woman’s testimony does not depend upon her sexual history.
  • Patriarchal and sexist to suggest that a woman cannot be believed when she states that she was raped, merely for the reason that she is sexually active.
  • Regrettable fact that two-finger test continues to be conducted even today.
  • ALSO READ | Ban Two-Finger Test on Sexual Assault Victims, Madurai HC Bench Orders Tamil Nadu Government
  • The Union and State Governments to ensure guidelines against test formulated by Ministry of Health and Family Welfare are circulated to all hospitals.
  • The Governments to ensure that workshops are conducted to ensure appropriate procedure is adopted while examining survivors of sexual assault and rape.
  • The Government shall review medical school curriculum to ensure “two-finger test” or per vaginum examination is not prescribed as procedure to examine rape and sexual assault survivors.
  • Any person who conducts the “two-finger test” or per vaginum examination (while examining a person alleged to have been subjected to a sexual assault) in contravention of the directions of this Court shall be guilty of misconduct.

Read all the Latest India News here

first published:October 31, 2022, 20:09 IST
last updated:October 31, 2022, 20:22 IST