Take the pledge to vote

For a better tommorow#AajSawaroApnaKal
  • I agree to receive emails from News18

  • I promise to vote in this year's elections no matter what the odds are.
  • Please check above checkbox.

    SUBMIT

Thank you for
taking the pledge

Vote responsibly as each vote counts
and makes a diffrence

Disclaimer:

Issued in public interest by HDFC Life. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (Formerly HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited) (“HDFC Life”). CIN: L65110MH2000PLC128245, IRDAI Reg. No. 101 . The name/letters "HDFC" in the name/logo of the company belongs to Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited ("HDFC Limited") and is used by HDFC Life under an agreement entered into with HDFC Limited. ARN EU/04/19/13618
LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
»
1-min read

We're Like Swiggy, Only Deliver Drugs, e-Pharmacies Tell Delhi High Court

The e-pharmacies said just like Swiggy does not require a restaurant licence to deliver food, they do not require any licence to deliver medicines to customers who purchase drugs online.

PTI

Updated:July 4, 2019, 4:02 PM IST
facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp
We're Like Swiggy, Only Deliver Drugs, e-Pharmacies Tell Delhi High Court
File photo of Delhi High Court (Picture courtesy: Getty Images)
Loading...

New Delhi: E-pharmacies on Thursday told the Delhi High Court that they do not require a licence for online sale of drugs and prescription medicines as they do not sell them, instead they are only delivering the medications akin to food-delivery app Swiggy.

The e-pharmacies told a bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice C Hari Shankar that just like Swiggy does not require a restaurant licence to deliver food, they do not require any licence to deliver medicines to customers who purchase drugs online.

The submission came during hearing of a plea seeking contempt action against the e-pharmacies for continuing to sell drugs online despite a high court order staying such activity. The petition also seeks contempt action against the central government for allegedly not taking any action against the defaulting e-pharmacies.

The Centre, in its defence, told the court that framing of rules to regulate e-pharmacies was under consideration and consultations were being held with all the stakeholders.

Several of the e-pharmacy companies and the Centre also sought time to file their response to the contempt plea. Subsequently, the bench granted them time till September 24, the next date of hearing.

The contempt plea was filed by Zaheer Ahmed who had earlier moved a PIL seeking a ban on "illegal" sale of drugs online. The high court had earlier stayed the sale of drugs and prescription medicines by online pharmacies while hearing Ahmed's PIL.

In his earlier petition, he has said that the online illegal sale of medicines would lead to a drug epidemic, drug abuse and misutilisation of habit forming and addictive drugs.

The PIL has said that since there was no mechanism to control the sale of medicines online, this puts health and lives of people at a high risk and affects their right to a safe and healthy life under Article 21 of the Constitution.

"Online pharmacies are operating without a drug licence and cannot be regulated in the present regime. Unregulated and unlicensed sale of medicines will increase risk of spurious, misbranded and sub-standard drugs being sold," the plea has said.

Read full article
Loading...
Next Story
Next Story

Also Watch

facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp

Live TV

Loading...
Countdown To Elections Results
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results