Take the pledge to vote

For a better tommorow#AajSawaroApnaKal
  • I agree to receive emails from News18

  • I promise to vote in this year's elections no matter what the odds are.
  • Please check above checkbox.

    SUBMIT

Thank you for
taking the pledge

Vote responsibly as each vote counts
and makes a diffrence

Disclaimer:

Issued in public interest by HDFC Life. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (Formerly HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited) (“HDFC Life”). CIN: L65110MH2000PLC128245, IRDAI Reg. No. 101 . The name/letters "HDFC" in the name/logo of the company belongs to Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited ("HDFC Limited") and is used by HDFC Life under an agreement entered into with HDFC Limited. ARN EU/04/19/13618
LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
»
1-min read

When Dynasties Lose, Development Wins, Suggests Harvard Paper

For the first time, a Harvard University research paper has attempted to empirically dissect the impact of democratically elected political dynasties on various social and economic parameters.

News18.com

Updated:August 21, 2017, 1:02 PM IST
facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp
When Dynasties Lose, Development Wins, Suggests Harvard Paper
File photo of Parliament.
Loading...

New Delhi: How do dynasties affect the socio-political-economic milieu in a country? Clintons, Bushs, Kennedys, Kirschners, Gandhis, Bhuttos, Yudhyonos, Aquinos, Abes, Kims and Lees, it’s a long list.

For the first time, a Harvard University research paper has attempted to empirically dissect the impact of democratically elected political dynasties on various social and economic parameters.

With India as their case study, the co-authors of the paper Siddharth Eapen George and Dominic Ponattu of University of Mannheim, Germany show that constituencies where dynast narrowly win grow 6.5 percentage points slower annually than where they narrowly lose.

Referring to previous studies, the paper lists how there has been evidence to show that dynasts may behave like “stationary bandits” and invest more in their constituencies. Or they “may have particularly strong incentives to foster long-term clientelistic relationships, which may chill political competition and worsen governance.”

The study has used various empirical methods to draw its conclusions like night-time luminosity as a measure of local economic activity. The study says these results hold even when comparing neighbouring villages that are in the same administrative district but different political constituencies.

The other important findings of the paper include: dynastic rule worsens public good provision, voters subjectively assess dynastic politicians to perform worse. But this effect is only observed among non-coethnic voters- claims the paper as dynasts tend to foster ethnic patronage.

For the purpose of this study, a dynast has been defined as a candidate with “at least one family member who has previously held political office in the state or national assembly”.

By this definition nearly 16% of winners and runners-up in Lok Sabha elections over the past two decades are dynasts.

The study looks closely at specific close family connections: 2/3 of dynastic politicians are sons, daughters or spouses (usually wife) of a current or former office-holder.

However, the study also finds that negative impacts of dynastic rule do not appear to be driven by greater rent-seeking among dynasts measured by personal wealth gains while in office); lower effort exerted by dynastic politicians measured by participation in the legislature; and dynastic victories reducing political competition in subsequent periods.

| Edited by: Nitya Thirumalai
Read full article
Loading...
Next Story
Next Story

Also Watch

facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp

Live TV

Loading...
Countdown To Elections Results
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results