Take the pledge to vote

For a better tommorow#AajSawaroApnaKal
  • I agree to receive emails from News18

  • I promise to vote in this year's elections no matter what the odds are.
  • Please check above checkbox.

    SUBMIT

Thank you for
taking the pledge

Vote responsibly as each vote counts
and makes a diffrence

Disclaimer:

Issued in public interest by HDFC Life. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (Formerly HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited) (“HDFC Life”). CIN: L65110MH2000PLC128245, IRDAI Reg. No. 101 . The name/letters "HDFC" in the name/logo of the company belongs to Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited ("HDFC Limited") and is used by HDFC Life under an agreement entered into with HDFC Limited. ARN EU/04/19/13618
LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
»
1-min read

Woman Can't File Dowry Harassment FIR After Divorce, Says Supreme Court

The maximum punishment under penal provisions for dowry harassment goes up to five years in jail along with monetary penalty.

Utkarsh Anand | CNN-News18

Updated:September 9, 2018, 10:10 AM IST
facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp
Woman Can't File Dowry Harassment FIR After Divorce, Says Supreme Court
Image for representation.
Loading...

New Delhi: There cannot be an FIR against a man and his family members under dowry harassment charges after divorce, the Supreme Court has ruled.

The top court has held that prosecution under Section 498A of IPC or under other provisions of the Dowry Prohibition Act will not be sustainable once a couple has separated under the pertinent law.

The maximum punishment under penal provisions goes up to five years in jail along with monetary penalty.

A bench of Justices SA Bobde and L Nageswara Rao highlighted that Section 498A of the IPC opens with the words "Whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman….”

Therefore, the bench said, where the complainant approaches with a case that there has already been a divorce, Section 498A will not be attracted. Similarly, there cannot be a case under Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

The occasion for the court to clarify the legal position came up when a man and his family approached it for quashing an FIR registered against them under Section 498A of IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act.

The Allahabad High Court had in 2016 dismissed their plea for exoneration in an FIR lodged in Jalaun district of Uttar Pradesh.

The lawyer for the former husband and his relatives submitted before the bench that the prosecution is not tenable in view of the case of the complainant herself that there had been a divorce almost four years before filing of the FIR.

The court said there is much substance in this argument. "In view of her own averment that she was divorced four years ago, we are of the view that the prosecution is not sustainable under section 498A of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961," said the bench.

It then quashed the prosecution against all the accused persons under dowry harassment charges.

Get the best of News18 delivered to your inbox - subscribe to News18 Daybreak. Follow News18.com on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok and on YouTube, and stay in the know with what's happening in the world around you – in real time.

Subscribe to Moneycontrol Pro and gain access to curated markets data, trading recommendations, equity analysis, investment ideas, insights from market gurus and much more. Get Moneycontrol PRO for 1 year at price of 3 months. Use code FREEDOM.

| Edited by: Nitya Thirumalai
Read full article
Loading...
Next Story
Next Story

Also Watch

facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp

Live TV

Loading...
Countdown To Elections Results
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results