Take the pledge to vote

For a better tommorow#AajSawaroApnaKal
  • I agree to receive emails from News18

  • I promise to vote in this year's elections no matter what the odds are.
  • Please check above checkbox.


Thank you for
taking the pledge

Vote responsibly as each vote counts
and makes a diffrence


Issued in public interest by HDFC Life. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (Formerly HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited) (“HDFC Life”). CIN: L65110MH2000PLC128245, IRDAI Reg. No. 101 . The name/letters "HDFC" in the name/logo of the company belongs to Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited ("HDFC Limited") and is used by HDFC Life under an agreement entered into with HDFC Limited. ARN EU/04/19/13618
LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
News18 English
Powered by cricketnext logo
1-min read

FCAT Has Better Representatives Than CBFC, Says Babumoshai Bandookbaaz Writer

Ghalib Asad Bhopali says film's team is expecting justice for Babumoshai Bandookbaaz from the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal (FCAT).


Updated:August 8, 2017, 4:04 PM IST
FCAT Has Better Representatives Than CBFC, Says Babumoshai Bandookbaaz Writer
Image: Instagram/ Nawazuddin Siddiqui

Mumbai: Babumoshai Bandookbaaz writer Ghalib Asad Bhopali says that Film Certification Appellate Tribunal (FCAT) has better representation than the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), which demanded 48 cuts of the films to get 'A' certification.

He says the film's team is expecting justice for Babumoshai Bandookbaaz from the FCAT.

Asked about his expectation of the decision on the film, Bhopali said: "We are expecting justice for our film and I am sure it will be a fair judgment because the panellists of the Tribunal come from different walks of life."

"On the other hand, in CBFC, there are five members from the same socio-cultural background and, therefore, their approach towards the understanding of judging a film and sentiments of our audience is not wide. I think FCAT has better representatives than CBFC and, therefore, we hope for a better judgment."

He added: "India is a diverse country with different cultures and religions. So, it is important to understand everyone's sentiments and who will relate with what story while judging a film. In the Tribunal, we have seen, there is one theatre personality, one journalist, a former Judge, a politician among others. Therefore, the film will be judged from different perspectives. That is important for justice."

The controversy around the film started when the makers went to the CBFC. They have alleged that the CBFC panel not only demanded 48 cuts of the film that will "spoil the essence of the narration", but also misbehaved with the producer of the film, Kiran Shroff.

Asked about why they didn't go to CBFC's Revising Committee, Bhopali said: "When our film' director Kushan Nandy went to CBFC for the certification, (CBFC Chairperson) Pahlaj Nihalani said, 'You can go to Revising Committee, but we will double the cuts'. So, there's no point of going through that."

| Edited by: Kriti Tulsiani
Read full article
Next Story
Next Story

Also Watch


Live TV

Countdown To Elections Results
  • 01 d
  • 12 h
  • 38 m
  • 09 s
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results