Take the pledge to vote

For a better tommorow#AajSawaroApnaKal
  • I agree to receive emails from News18

  • I promise to vote in this year's elections no matter what the odds are.
  • Please check above checkbox.

    SUBMIT

Thank you for
taking the pledge

Vote responsibly as each vote counts
and makes a diffrence

Disclaimer:

Issued in public interest by HDFC Life. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (Formerly HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited) (“HDFC Life”). CIN: L65110MH2000PLC128245, IRDAI Reg. No. 101 . The name/letters "HDFC" in the name/logo of the company belongs to Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited ("HDFC Limited") and is used by HDFC Life under an agreement entered into with HDFC Limited. ARN EU/04/19/13618
LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
News18 English
»
2-min read

Padmavati Row: SC Refuses To Stay Release of Bhansali's Film, Allahabad HC Declines to Entertain Plea for Ban

An apex court bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra refused to entertain a plea seeking a stay of the release of the film after it enquired at the outset as to whether or not the Censor Board has issued the certification.

PTI

Updated:November 10, 2017, 5:52 PM IST
facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp
Padmavati Row: SC Refuses To Stay Release of Bhansali's Film, Allahabad HC Declines to Entertain Plea for Ban
A still from Ghoomar song. (Photo sourced from YouTube)
Loading...

New Delhi/Lucknow: The Supreme Court on Friday refused to stay the release of Deepika Padukone starrer Padmavati over which the Allahabad High Court also declined to entertain a plea seeking a ban of the Bollywood film.

The Sanjay Leela Bhansali-directed period drama, which also starred Ranveer Singh and Shahid Kapoor, in lead roles is due to be released on December 1.

The court verdicts come as a big boost to Bhansali in the aftermath of a mob attack in Jaipur and a vandalism incident in Kolhapur during the shooting of the film.

An apex court bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra refused to entertain a plea seeking a stay of the release of the film after it enquired at the outset as to whether or not the Censor Board has issued the certification.

"Has the film been placed before the Censor Board? Has the Censor Board certified the film," the bench, which also comprised Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud, asked from the counsel for petitioners.

On being intimated that the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) was yet to certify the movie, the bench said, "this court should not exercise its writ jurisdiction in such situation".

The top court said that there were several guidelines for the CBFC in granting certification to a movie and moreover, there is Film Certification Appellate Tribunal (FCAT) to look into grievances regarding a film.

The bench was hearing a plea filed by Siddharajsinh Mahavirsinh Chudasama and 11 others against the film.

Besides seeking a stay on the release of the movie, the plea had also sought setting up of a committee of eminent historians to check the veracity of the script to prevent any inaccuracy in portrayal of Rani Padmavati.

It was also contended that the film be not allowed to be released till such time any historical inaccuracies in the movie are corrected by the producer and the director.

The plea noted that the war-saga was based on the 13th century historical battle between Maharaja Ratan Singh and his army of Mewar and Sultan Alauddin Khilji of Delhi. It claimed that the movie distorted certain historical facts "hurting the sentiments of Kshatriya community".

"The trailers show Rani Padmavati doing a 'ghoomar' dance," the plea said, alleging that "the depiction of Rani Padmavati in the said dance sequence is contrary to how traditionally 'ghoomar' is being performed...."

In Lucknow, a division bench of the Allahabad High Court asked a petitioner, seeking a ban on the movie Padmavati on the ground that it allegedly propagates the practice of 'Sati', to approach the Censor Board with his plea. Sati is a practice whereby a widow threw herself on to her husband's funeral pyre.

The bench comprising justices Vikram Nath and Abdul Moin on Thursday refused to interfere in the matter.

The petitioner Kamta Prasad Singhal had pleaded that under the Sati (Prevention) Act, the practice was banned and even its propagation was banned and made punishable. Citing the said provision, the petitioner claimed that the movie shows women committing sati and therefore, should be banned.

Declining to go into the merits of the matter, the bench said the petitioner has another forum where he could appeal for his grievance.

| Edited by: Kriti Tulsiani
Read full article
Loading...
Next Story
Next Story

Also Watch

facebookTwitterskypewhatsapp
 
 

Live TV

Loading...
Countdown To Elections Results
  • 01 d
  • 12 h
  • 38 m
  • 09 s
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results