Take the pledge to vote

For a better tommorow#AajSawaroApnaKal
  • I agree to receive emails from News18

  • I promise to vote in this year's elections no matter what the odds are.
  • Please check above checkbox.


Thank you for
taking the pledge

Vote responsibly as each vote counts
and makes a diffrence


Issued in public interest by HDFC Life. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (Formerly HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited) (“HDFC Life”). CIN: L65110MH2000PLC128245, IRDAI Reg. No. 101 . The name/letters "HDFC" in the name/logo of the company belongs to Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited ("HDFC Limited") and is used by HDFC Life under an agreement entered into with HDFC Limited. ARN EU/04/19/13618
LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
News18 English
News18 » Politics
3-min read

Andhra Pradesh High Court Refuses to Stall EC Order Transferring Two IPS Officers

The chief secretary also got a writ petition filed in the high court, challenging the EC order even as Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu shot off a seven-page letter to the poll panel, protesting against the transfers, particularly that of the DG, Intelligence.


Updated:April 23, 2019, 7:31 PM IST
Election Commission of India building
File Photo of the Election Commission of India building.

Amaravati: The Andhra Pradesh High Court on Friday refused to stall the Election Commission (EC)'s order, transferring two IPS officers, including the director general of intelligence and a non-cadre officer in the state government, and keeping them away from election duties.

The Chandrababu Naidu government was keen on retaining the controversial DG, Intelligence, A B Venkateswara Rao, whom the opposition YSR Congress has been accusing of "working like a TDP cadre".

A division bench, comprising acting Chief Justice Praveen Kumar and Justice Satyanarayana Murthy, ruled that there was 'no case for interim relief' in the matter and said the state government should comply with the EC order.

It rejected the government's contentions on the issue, particularly that the DG had nothing to do with the conduct of elections and that the EC had no jurisdiction over him.

The EC had late on Tuesday night issued an order to Chief Secretary Anil Chandra Punetha, directing that the DG, Intelligence, and superintendents of police of Kadapa and Srikakulam districts be transferred forthwith and attached to the state police headquarters.

It said no election-related work should be assigned to the three officers till the completion of the polls. Around midnight on Tuesday, Punetha issued an order transferring the three officers in line with the directive.

The scene, however, changed on Wednesday as the chief secretary issued a fresh order that afternoon, cancelling his earlier one and retained the Rao to the same post, while shifting the two SPs.

The EC, subsequently, appointed Grewal Navdeep Singh and Abhishek Mohanty as SPs of Srikakulam and Kadapa districts.

The chief secretary also got a writ petition filed in the high court, challenging the EC order even as Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu shot off a seven-page letter to the poll panel, protesting against the transfers, particularly that of the DG, Intelligence.

Naidu said the Election Commission's action was 'prima facie hasty, biased, undemocratic and suffers from the principles of natural justice".

He said the EC's conduct was "questionable" due to this "coloured decision", which is deliberately aimed at benefitting the YSR Congress "under the influence of (Prime Minister) Narendra Modi, aided by (Telangana Chief Minister) K Chandrasekar Rao".

The government issued a separate order on Wednesday, designating certain police officers from the DGP to the rank of a constable for law and order duties in connection with the April 11 elections to the Lok Sabha and Assembly.

The DG, intelligence, has been kept away from election duties.

"The ECI cannot engage in unchecked, arbitrary and uncanalised exercise of power. The EC order suffers from the vice of lack of jurisdiction, suffers from being a colourable exercise of power and is based on alien purposes or oblique motives which have nothing to do with the conduct of polling duties," state political secretary (general administration department) N Srikant said in the petition, filed on behalf of the chief secretary.

The high court heard arguments in the case on Thursday. The YSR Congress also impleaded in the case.

Advocate General D Srinivas contented that the EC has no jurisdiction to transfer an officer not under its purview.

Former AG Prakash Reddy, counsel for the ECI, said the DG, intelligence, was very much on election-related duties under Section 28-A of the Representation of People Act and that the state government had issued an order in this regard.

The AG claimed the said government order was issued erroneously. "How could the police department function without the intelligence wing?" the EC advocate asked.

The high court delivered its verdict on the petition on Friday, refusing to grant any relief to the state government.

Get the best of News18 delivered to your inbox - subscribe to News18 Daybreak. Follow News18.com on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, Telegram, TikTok and on YouTube, and stay in the know with what's happening in the world around you – in real time.

Read full article
Next Story
Next Story

Also Watch


Live TV

Countdown To Elections Results
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results