Take the pledge to vote

For a better tommorow#AajSawaroApnaKal
  • I agree to receive emails from News18

  • I promise to vote in this year's elections no matter what the odds are.
  • Please check above checkbox.


Thank you for
taking the pledge

Vote responsibly as each vote counts
and makes a diffrence


Issued in public interest by HDFC Life. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (Formerly HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited) (“HDFC Life”). CIN: L65110MH2000PLC128245, IRDAI Reg. No. 101 . The name/letters "HDFC" in the name/logo of the company belongs to Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited ("HDFC Limited") and is used by HDFC Life under an agreement entered into with HDFC Limited. ARN EU/04/19/13618
LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
2-min read

Defamation Case: Delhi HC Refuses to Entertain Plea Against Payment to Ram Jethmalani

Delhi HC refuses to entertain plea against use of public money to pay Ram Jethmalani in defamation case against Arvind Kejriwal.


Updated:April 17, 2017, 3:39 PM IST
Defamation Case: Delhi HC Refuses to Entertain Plea Against Payment to Ram Jethmalani
(File photo of Ram Jethmalani .)

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Monday refused to entertain a plea seeking to restrain the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government from paying Rs 1.22 crore to veteran lawyer Ram Jethmalani for appearing on behalf of Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in a defamation suit filed against him by Union Minister Arun Jaitley.

Jethmalani, expelled by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), has been appearing for Kejriwal in the Rs 10-crore civil defamation suit filed by Jaitley against Kejriwal and five other AAP leaders for accusing him (Jaitley) of financial bungling in the Delhi and District Cricket Association (DDCA).

A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice Anu Malhotra said the issue raised through the petition was already pending before the Lieutenant Governor.

"If the authorities concerned are not taking any action against the issue raised by you, then only you can move the court. The L-G is already seized of the issue. Therefore, there is no need of interference by this court," the bench said. It further said this petition was totally a "waste" of the court's time.

Sensing the mood of the court, the petitioner and advocate Alakh Alok Srivastava wished to withdraw his plea, which was allowed by the court.

The plea sought direction to the Delhi government and LG to refrain from making any payment from public money towards the December 1, 2016, invoice or any other bill raised by Jethmalani towards professional services rendered to Kejriwal in the defamation case.

It also sought a direction to the Delhi government and LG to immediately withdraw the December 21, 2016, file which approved the legal bills of Jethmalani.

The petition also sought formulation and implementation of stringent rules and regulations to restrain the government departments from making any payment from public money towards any private litigation cost incurred by public representatives or public officials in their private capacities.

Earlier, Jethmalani had hit out at Jaitley, alleging that the row over the Delhi government's move to clear his bills has been "instigated" by the Union Finance Minister as "he is afraid of my cross-examination".

He had also said it was the government's duty to defend the Chief Minister. The senior advocate had said he would defend Kejriwal in the defamation case without charging any fee if the Chief Minister could not afford to pay him.

Earlier, Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia had directed the General Administration Department to clear Jethmalani's bills.

Kejriwal had earlier defended his government's move, suggesting Jaitley had filed the case after he raised the issue of alleged corruption in the DDCA when the BJP leader was at the helm of it.

| Edited by: Huma Tabassum
Read full article
Next Story
Next Story

Also Watch


Live TV

Countdown To Elections Results
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results