Take the pledge to vote

For a better tommorow#AajSawaroApnaKal
  • I agree to receive emails from News18

  • I promise to vote in this year's elections no matter what the odds are.
  • Please check above checkbox.


Thank you for
taking the pledge

Vote responsibly as each vote counts
and makes a diffrence


Issued in public interest by HDFC Life. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (Formerly HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited) (“HDFC Life”). CIN: L65110MH2000PLC128245, IRDAI Reg. No. 101 . The name/letters "HDFC" in the name/logo of the company belongs to Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited ("HDFC Limited") and is used by HDFC Life under an agreement entered into with HDFC Limited. ARN EU/04/19/13618
LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
News18 English
News18 » Politics
3-min read

High Court Questions Propriety of Sidhu Continuing With TV Show

The PIL, filed by advocate HC Arora in the Punjab and Haryana High Court, stated that it was a conflict of interest for Navjot Singh Sidhu to continue with a TV show even after assuming responsibility in the government.

Jyoti Kamal | CNN-News18jyotik

Updated:April 7, 2017, 11:24 PM IST
Navjot Singh Sidhu
File Image of Navjot Singh Sidhu speaking to CNN-News18.

Chandigarh: Controversy surrounding Navjot Singh Sidhu for continuing with a TV show despite being a minister in the Punjab Cabinet refuses to die down.

A Public Interest Litigation filed in the Punjab and Haryana High Court had the Court asking Punjab's Advocate General if every matter has to be taken up legally or should there also be a proprietary and moral aspect to it.

The PIL, filed by advocate HC Arora in the Punjab and Haryana High Court, stated that it was a conflict of interest for Navjot Singh Sidhu to continue with a TV show even after assuming responsibility in the government.

The PIL further appealed to the court to restrain Navjot Sidhu from working in TV shows.

The matter was heard by the Court on Friday where advocate HC Arora also cited a judgement of the Andhra Pradesh high court. The judgment pertains to NT Rama Rao continuing with the post of Chief Minister even while he was working in the film industry.

The court asked why Navjot Singh Sidhu was not following rules that are applicable to star MPs as well. The court also asked if indeed it was not a case of conflict of interest and misconduct if a Minister appointed to the government was also running a business alongside with being a public servant.

The court also observed that in every case legality is not the only thing taken into account but also moral grounds and propriety need to be considered.

Advocate general Atul Nanda said he cannot respond to the case on behalf of the government at this point in time following which the High Court set May 11 as the next date of hearing in the case. Advocate General Atul Nanda also said so far neither the Punjab government nor Navjot Singh Sidhu have been issued any notice by the High Court.

He also said there are several discussions that go on inside the court room and all of them do not have to be reported, and added this was no blow to either Navjot Sidhu or to the Punjab government.

ALSO READ: Punjab CM to Seek Legal Opinion on Navjot Sidhu's Act in Kapil Sharma Show

He also said moral correctness can be an issue but he does not think that the court can impose moral correctness on anyone. He said the PIL might not stand in court as it does not have any strong legal ground.

Navjot Singh Sidhu has not commented on the PIL. However, his wife Navjot Kaur has defended him and questioned the intention behind the filing of the PIL in the court.

Navjot Kaur also said it was only honest people who had to deal with PILs filed in courts and said some people have looted Punjab but no cases have been filed against them. She questioned what was wrong if Navjot Singh Sidhu does some extra work to earn money that allows him to run his household.

She said, "There are many politicians who are running businesses worth Rs 300 to 400 crore but Navjot Singh Sidhu does not even have a business that is worth 1,00,000 rupees. And if he works at night to earn some extra money then people have a problem with that too."

For now the court has adjourned the matter to 11 May.

ALSO READ: Navjot Singh Sidhu Can Continue TV Innings, Amarinder Too in Favour

Get the best of News18 delivered to your inbox - subscribe to News18 Daybreak. Follow News18.com on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, Telegram, TikTok and on YouTube, and stay in the know with what's happening in the world around you – in real time.

| Edited by: Bijaya Das
Read full article
Next Story
Next Story

Also Watch


Live TV

Countdown To Elections Results
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results