Take the pledge to vote

For a better tommorow#AajSawaroApnaKal
  • I agree to receive emails from News18

  • I promise to vote in this year's elections no matter what the odds are.
  • Please check above checkbox.


Thank you for
taking the pledge

Vote responsibly as each vote counts
and makes a diffrence


Issued in public interest by HDFC Life. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited (Formerly HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited) (“HDFC Life”). CIN: L65110MH2000PLC128245, IRDAI Reg. No. 101 . The name/letters "HDFC" in the name/logo of the company belongs to Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited ("HDFC Limited") and is used by HDFC Life under an agreement entered into with HDFC Limited. ARN EU/04/19/13618
LIVE TV DownloadNews18 App
4-min read

'Non-Gandhi' Can be Congress Chief, But Family Must Remain Active in Politics, Says Mani Shankar Aiyar

Senior Congress leader Mani Shankar Aiyar claims the objective of BJP is to have 'Gandhi-mukt Congress' so as to have a 'Congress-mukt Bharat'.


Updated:June 23, 2019, 7:20 PM IST
'Non-Gandhi' Can be Congress Chief, But Family Must Remain Active in Politics, Says Mani Shankar Aiyar
File photo of Mani Shankar Aiyar. (Image: Reuters)

New Delhi: Amid uncertainty over Rahul Gandhi continuing as Congress president, senior leader Mani Shankar Aiyar on Sunday said that a 'non-Gandhi' can be the party chief, but the Gandhi family must remain active within the organisation.

The BJP's objective is to have a "Gandhi-mukt Congress" so as to have a "Congress-mukt Bharat", he claimed. It would be best that Rahul remains party chief, but at the same time, Rahul's own wishes must also be respected, he added.

"I am sure we can survive if we have to without a Nehru-Gandhi as the titular head of the party, provided the Nehru-Gandhis remain active in the party and can help resolve a crisis in case serious differences arise," he said.

Aiyar said Gandhi has given about a month to the party to find a replacement and there have been confabulations within the Congress over the issue with the feeling in the party overwhelmingly in favour of him staying on.

The former Union minister, however, emphasised that instead of speculating, media must wait for the "deadline" to know whether a replacement has been found or Gandhi gets persuaded to remain as Congress chief.

"I don't think it is a matter of personalities. I know it is the objective of the BJP to have a Gandhi-mukt Congress so as to have a Congress-mukt Bharat. I don't think we should be falling

into the trap of thinking that they have discovered something that we are not able to discover," Aiyar said.

"If you simply cut off the head, then the chicken may start fluttering as it does in the animal kingdom," the 78-year-old leader said when asked if organisational overhaul at the top was


Aiyar cited several instances in the history of the party when people from outside the Nehru-Gandhi family were presidents of the party, from UN Dhebar to Brahmananda Reddy. The same model could even now be adopted, he said.

"Since we know that Mrs (Sonia) Gandhi is the head of the parliamentary party and Mr (Rahul) Gandhi is part and parcel of our parliamentary party, I have every confidence that whether with Mr Rahul Gandhi at the helm or somebody else, the party will fight back and resume in the fullness of time its position as the natural leader of what I call the Idea of India Movement," he said.

Gandhi had offered to quit as the party chief during the May 25 meeting of the Congress Working Committee (CWC), which was called to analyse the party's poor performance in the Lok Sabha polls, in which it managed to win just 52 seats. The CWC had unanimously rejected his offer to quit but Gandhi has been apparently firm on his stand.

Amid speculation over his next steps, Gandhi on Thursday said his party will decide on who his successor will be and not him.

Aiyar also asserted that the Congress got its arithmetic wrong in the Lok Sabha polls when it came to forging alliances. Hence, chemistry did not prevail over arithmetic. It was the arithmetic

itself that did not get properly put in play.

Aiyar said the only places where the arithmetic worked out was in his state of Tamil Nadu with the DMK, more than the Congress, taking the initiative, and in Kerala where the UDF has long been a well-established coalition. He said the Congress for a large part of its history has been a movement and must now work towards building a "confederal movement" that attracts breakaway parties back into the family by telling them that they need not lose their separate identity by returning to their parent family movement.

"Through the freedom struggle, the Congress was a movement. Now we are a party. A party requires a very distinct profile that above all, is not only distinguished from the Hindutva forces, but

at the same time becomes a kind of confederal movement," Aiyar said, adding that the parties need to be told that the challenge now is not the Congress or them against one another, but the BJP.

"Whatever our differences and wherever we are dominant, the one thing that unites us is a belief in a secular India which is being challenged by this alternative idea that is being propagated

by the other side and now with much more force than ever because they have political power," Aiyar said.

A grand alliance of all like-minded parties, not necessarily under Congress leadership, but as a result of a Congress initiative, could be the answer to the challenge, he said.

He said all such parties who believe in the Idea of India, which is different to that of the BJP, must first come together as a united opposition, before aligning for electoral gains.

"At election time, we can decide if this gets converted into electoral alliances or not," he said, advocating an ideological confederation of secular parties.

Asked if the Congress' tryst with 'soft Hindutva' had failed and the party needs to strongly advocate secularism, Aiyar said, "I reject the expression 'soft Hindutva' because I don't believe

Congress has moved in the direction of becoming a soft Hindutva party, but it is clear that the absence and hesitation in using the word 'secularism' and trying to find other synonyms like

pluralism indicate a certain want of confidence and conviction in the idea of secularism."

"India is a secular country and therefore we should be absolutely firm in articulating the view which is the essence of our Constitution and which is the essence of what we have been calling the Idea of India," he said.

Read full article
Next Story
Next Story

Also Watch


Live TV

Countdown To Elections Results
To Assembly Elections 2018 Results