Ohio Killer Alleging Racism-tainted Jury Seeks New Trial
FILE - In this March 23, 2001, file photo, Gregory McKnight, 24, is comforted by his attorney in Vinton County Common Pleas Court in McArthur, Ohio, after he was indicted. Lawyers for McKnight, an Ohio death row inmate who is Black, are seeking a new trial based on allegations of racial slurs used during jury deliberations over the inmate's fate. McKnight was sentenced to death almost 20 years ago for the 1999 kidnapping and slaying of a white female college student. (AP Photo/Bill Graham, File)
An Ohio death row inmate who is Black deserves a new trial based on allegations that some white jurors used racial slurs in describing him during their deliberations over his fate, according to arguments before a state appeals court.
- Associated Press
- Last Updated: October 1, 2020, 17:24 IST
- FOLLOW US ON:
COLUMBUS, Ohio: An Ohio death row inmate who is Black deserves a new trial based on allegations that some white jurors used racial slurs in describing him during their deliberations over his fate, according to arguments before a state appeals court.
Defendant Gregory McKnight was sentenced to death nearly 20 years ago for the 2000 kidnapping and fatal shooting of Emily Murray, a 20-year-old white student at Kenyon College in central Ohio. McKnight also received a life sentence after being convicted in 2002 of murder for the killing around the same time of a 20-year-old Black man, Gregory Julious.
Allegations of racial slurs are contained in accounts provided to an investigator for McKnight’s attorneys who in 2017 began tracking down jurors from the trial.
The deliberations were replete with racist statements and discussions of the rawest and most shocking nature during both the guilt and penalty phases of the trial, McKnight’s lawyers argued in a document filed with the Fourth District Court of Appeals.
Authorities say McKnight kidnapped Murray from the campus area and then shot her in the head near his rural home and rolled her body in a carpet. McKnight was also accused of fatally shooting Julious, whose skeletal remains were found on the property during a search.
The court filing said multiple people on the jury used a racial slur when referring to McKnight, according to one of the jurors interviewed by the investigator.
McKnight’s attorneys say a 2017 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court allows them to bring such arguments up now. In that decision, Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado, the court said lower courts can examine jury deliberations when there are indications that racial bias deprived a defendant of his right to a fair trial.
The Ohio Attorney General’s Office, opposes McKnight’s request for a new trial. It says the U.S. Supreme Court ruling doesn’t cover cases like McKnight’s that have already been decided.
A federal judge agreed and rejected a similar appeal over the alleged racial comments in 2018.
The state also notes the Fourth District appeals court previously rejected McKnight’s allegations of racism in his trial. The new affidavits contain hearsay and opinion and shouldn’t be admitted as evidence, the state said.
The evidence consists of nothing more than single and double hearsay about what somebody said about what somebody said, Stephen Maher, an assistant Ohio attorney general, wrote in a court filing last year.
The district appeals court scheduled oral arguments for Thursday morning. A decision isn’t expected for weeks.
McKnight doesn’t have an execution date. The death penalty is on long-term hold in Ohio while the state tries to find a supply of drugs to carry out lethal injection.
Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor