1-MIN READ

Singapore Court Upholds Colonial-Era Law That Criminalises Gay Sex

Participants of Pink Dot, an annual event organised in support of the LGBT community, gather in a formation protesting the repeal of Section 377A of Singapore's Penal Code, at the Speakers' Corner in Hong Lim Park in Singapore, June 29, 2019. Picture taken June 29, 2019. REUTERS/Feline Lim

Participants of Pink Dot, an annual event organised in support of the LGBT community, gather in a formation protesting the repeal of Section 377A of Singapore's Penal Code, at the Speakers' Corner in Hong Lim Park in Singapore, June 29, 2019. Picture taken June 29, 2019. REUTERS/Feline Lim

The ruling follows challenges last year to the colonial-era law, a thorny issue in the socially conservative city-state where repeal efforts failed in 2014, though activists were emboldened after India scrapped similar legislation in 2018.

  • Reuters
  • Last Updated: March 30, 2020, 2:40 PM IST
Share this:

Singapore: Singapore's high court on Monday upheld a law that criminalises sex between men, dismissing three appeals that argued it was unconstitutional, although prosecutions under the law are rare.

The ruling follows challenges last year to the colonial-era law, a thorny issue in the socially conservative city-state where repeal efforts failed in 2014, though activists were emboldened after India scrapped similar legislation in 2018.

"I am of course disappointed, but my eye is firmly on the road ahead," said Bryan Choong, one of three men who challenged the law. "I'll be studying this judgment closely with my lawyers."

The Attorney-General’s Chambers did not immediately comment.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has previously said that society in Singapore "is not that liberal on these matters".

However, after the Indian decision, a prominent Singapore diplomat urged challenges to the city-state's law, while Law Minister K. Shanmugam said a "growing minority" wanted it repealed and that laws should keep pace with societal change.

Polls have also suggested changing attitudes towards homosexuals, and a perceived softening in tone from some establishment figures.

The applicants in Monday's cases had argued that Section 377A, which provides for jail terms of up to two years for a man found to have committed an act of "gross indecency" with another man, was unconstitutional. The law does not apply to lesbians.

Rights groups had said Singapore's decision had wider implications for Asia, where social attitudes are conservative.

"In declining to strike out this archaic and discriminatory law, the court has reaffirmed that all gay men in Singapore are effectively unapprehended criminals," Téa Braun, director of the London-based rights group, Human Dignity Trust, said in a statement.

There have been concerns around growing intolerance toward the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community in Muslim-majority neighbours like Malaysia and Indonesia.


Share this:
Next Story
corona virus btn
corona virus btn
Loading