Home » News » World » US, Russia Walk Away From Landmark INF Treaty That Checked Arms Race

US, Russia Walk Away From Landmark INF Treaty That Checked Arms Race

Associated Press

Last Updated: August 02, 2019, 13:14 IST

US, Russia Walk Away From Landmark INF Treaty That Checked Arms Race

If after the US and Russia, which walked away from the INF treaty on Friday, do not extend the New START treaty in 2021, there will be no limit on the world's largest nuclear arsenals for the first time in nearly 50 years.

Washington: A landmark arms control treaty that President Ronald Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev signed three decades ago is dead, prompting fears of a new global arms race.

The United States and Russia both walked away from the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces treaty on Friday. If they choose not to extend or replace the larger New START treaty when it expires in early 2021, there will be no legally binding limits on the world's two largest nuclear arsenals for the first time in nearly a half century.

The US blames Russia for the demise of the treaty, saying that for years Moscow has been developing and fielding weapons that violate the treaty and threaten the US and its allies, particularly in Europe.

But without the constraints of the treaty, the Trump administration says it can now counter Russia and China. The US has complained for years of an unfair playing field that Russia was developing weapons that violated the treaty and China, which wasn't a signatory, was developing similar weapons that would have violated it, too.

President Donald Trump hasn't committed to extending or replacing New START, which imposed limits starting in 2018 on the number of US and Russian long-range nuclear warheads and launchers.

Trump has called New START "just another bad deal" made by the Obama administration, and Trump's national security adviser, John Bolton, said in June that it's unlikely the administration will agree to extend the treaty for five years, which could be done without legislative action in either capital.

The Trump administration thinks talks about extending New START are premature. The administration claims that with China's growing arsenal of nuclear warheads, Beijing can no longer be excluded from nuclear arms control agreements. Trump has expressed a desire to negotiate a trilateral arms control deal signed by the US, Russia and China.

"We'll see what happens," Trump told reporters at the White House on Thursday. "I will say Russia would like to do something on a nuclear treaty and that's OK with me. They'd like to do something and so would I." German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas said this week that the collapse of the treaty means a bit of security in Europe is being lost.

"We regret the fact that Russia has not done what was necessary to save the INF treaty. Now we call all the more on Russia and the US to preserve the New START treaty as a cornerstone of worldwide arms control," Maas said. "Nuclear powers such as China must also face up to their responsibility on arms control they have more weight in the world than at the time of the Cold War." Arms control advocates remain worried about the future.

Laura Kennedy, who formerly represented the US at the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva, warned Americans not to let their eyes glaze over when confronted with the complex diplomacy of arms control.

She said they should raise the issue now with Congress and all candidates running for the White House in 2020.

"This isn't 'wonkiness.' It's our future and the future of the planet," Kennedy said. "Nuclear issues are so consequential that we simply cannot abandon a serious arms control effort. Nor can

the US afford to cite its concerns over INF or other issues as an excuse to let the New START treaty lapse."

Over its lifetime, the 1987 so-called INF treaty led to the elimination of 2,692 US and Soviet Union nuclear and conventional ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles. Until its demise, the treaty banned land-based missiles with a range between 500 and 5,500 kilometers (310 to 3,410 miles).

David Wright, co-director of the Global Security Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said withdrawing from the treaty was "shortsighted." He said it will trigger a competition in conventionally armed missiles that will undermine stability.

Wright also noted Russia has complained about US missile systems in Poland and Romania. Wright said they are intended to launch interceptor missiles in defense, but appear to be capable of launching offensive cruise missiles as well.

"To claim the United States is justified in pulling out of the treaty because of Russian violations does not take the full picture into account," said Wright, who accuses the Trump administration of being averse to any negotiated agreements that constrain US weapons systems.

Former national intelligence director Dan Coats, however, told Congress late last year that intelligence officials believed it was Russia that no longer wanted to be constrained by the INF treaty as it modernized its military with precision-strike missiles ostensibly designed to target critical military and economic sites in Europe.

(This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed)
first published:August 02, 2019, 13:14 IST
last updated:August 02, 2019, 13:14 IST